PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2AMD.L is traded in GBp, while TLTI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TLTI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2AMD.L achieves a 345.45% return, which is significantly higher than TLTI.L's -5.44% return.


2AMD.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
98.27%
YTD
345.45%
6M
330.90%
1Y
1,086.85%
3Y*
74.75%
5Y*
45.83%
10Y*

TLTI.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-5.44%
6M
-7.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 2AMD.L and TLTI.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2AMD.L
2AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTI.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2AMD.LTLTI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.31

2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2AMD.LTLTI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

-0.33

+0.81

Drawdowns

2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -91.38%, which is greater than TLTI.L's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2AMD.L and TLTI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2AMD.LTLTI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.38%

-14.19%

-77.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-13.41%

+8.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.54%

-6.57%

-47.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.08%

Volatility

2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2AMD.LTLTI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

124.99%

13.44%

+111.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.20%

13.44%

+90.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.07%

13.44%

+88.63%

2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

2AMD.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

2AMD.L vs. TLTI.L - Dividend Comparison

2AMD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.


Frequently Asked Questions


2AMD.L and TLTI.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLTI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLTI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2AMD.L.

2AMD.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TLTI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 2AMD.L and 0.55% for TLTI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2AMD.L and TLTI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer