PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2AMD.L achieves a 376.62% return, which is significantly higher than DS2P.L's -11.00% return.


2AMD.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
6.69%
6M
305.97%
YTD
376.62%
1Y
600.38%
3Y*
83.12%
5Y*
42.02%
10Y*

DS2P.L

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.79%
6M
-1.11%
YTD
-11.00%
1Y
-7.47%
3Y*
-24.32%
5Y*
-20.16%
10Y*
-23.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
2AMD.L
Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP
376.62%82.40%-49.88%285.12%-86.24%111.82%136.69%
DS2P.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-11.00%-29.68%-28.35%-29.73%13.75%-35.96%-24.21%

Correlation

The correlation between 2AMD.L and DS2P.L is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

-0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2AMD.L
2AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DS2P.L
DS2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2AMD.LDS2P.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.99

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.42

-0.27

+13.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.14

-0.58

+26.72

2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.62, which is higher than the DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2AMD.L and DS2P.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, roughly equal to the maximum DS2P.L drawdown of -99.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2AMD.L and DS2P.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2AMD.LDS2P.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.50%

-99.62%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.04%

-27.26%

-27.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.49%

-67.63%

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.50%

-78.85%

-20.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.86%

-99.59%

+10.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.10%

-89.22%

+18.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.31%

12.82%

+15.49%

Volatility

2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) has a higher volatility of 45.27% compared to L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) at 9.45%. This indicates that 2AMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DS2P.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2AMD.LDS2P.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.27%

9.45%

+35.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

96.79%

28.11%

+68.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.72%

34.11%

+97.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4,319.16%

36.73%

+4,282.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3,905.42%

38.73%

+3,866.69%

2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

2AMD.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DS2P.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

2AMD.L vs. DS2P.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2AMD.L nor DS2P.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2AMD.L and DS2P.L have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DS2P.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DS2P.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2AMD.L.

2AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X AMD Index, while DS2P.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 2AMD.L and 0.50% for DS2P.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2AMD.L and DS2P.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer