PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2AMD.L is traded in GBp, while 3APE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3APE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2AMD.L achieves a 345.45% return, which is significantly higher than 3APE.L's 31.87% return.


2AMD.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
98.27%
YTD
345.45%
6M
330.90%
1Y
1,086.85%
3Y*
74.75%
5Y*
45.83%
10Y*

3APE.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
31.86%
YTD
31.87%
6M
10.82%
1Y
171.50%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
25.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
2AMD.L
Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP
345.45%82.40%-49.88%285.12%-86.24%111.82%22.96%
3APE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR
31.87%-28.19%70.01%152.53%-72.84%83.45%77.98%

Correlation

The correlation between 2AMD.L and 3APE.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020

0.36

The correlation between 2AMD.L and 3APE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2AMD.L
2AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

3APE.L
3APE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
3APE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3APE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
3APE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
3APE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
3APE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2AMD.L3APE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.35

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.03

4.10

+16.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.31

9.24

+32.06

2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 9.26, which is higher than the 3APE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2AMD.L and 3APE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2AMD.L3APE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26

2.48

+6.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.33

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.31

+0.17

Drawdowns

2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -91.38%, which is greater than 3APE.L's maximum drawdown of -75.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2AMD.L and 3APE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2AMD.L3APE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.38%

-75.68%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.04%

-41.58%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.49%

-72.96%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.38%

-75.68%

-15.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-7.96%

+3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.54%

-35.90%

-18.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.08%

18.47%

+9.61%

Volatility

2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) has a higher volatility of 46.51% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) at 15.90%. This indicates that 2AMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3APE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2AMD.L3APE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.51%

15.90%

+30.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.42%

49.55%

+37.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

124.99%

68.66%

+56.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.20%

79.49%

+24.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.07%

84.01%

+18.06%

2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2AMD.L and 3APE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2AMD.L vs. 3APE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2AMD.L nor 3APE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2AMD.L and 3APE.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2AMD.L and 3APE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

2AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X AMD Index, while 3APE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2AMD.L and 3APE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer