2846.HK vs. 3070.HK

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

2846.HK (iShares Core CSI 300 ETF) and 3070.HK (Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF) are both China Equities funds - 2846.HK tracks the CSI 300 Index while 3070.HK tracks the CSI Hong Kong Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 2846.HK returned 7.23%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for 3070.HK. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2846.HK charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for 3070.HK.

Performance

2846.HK vs. 3070.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in iShares Core CSI 300 ETF (2846.HK) and Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF (3070.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2846.HK achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than 3070.HK's 7.62% return. Over the past 10 years, 2846.HK has underperformed 3070.HK with an annualized return of 7.23%, while 3070.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.

2846.HK

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -4.29%
• 6M: 4.34%
• YTD: 6.74%
• 1Y: 24.47%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: -0.33%
• 10Y*: 7.23%
• ALL TIME*: 3.39%

3070.HK

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 2.92%
• 6M: 6.44%
• YTD: 7.62%
• 1Y: 11.70%
• 3Y*: 23.47%
• 5Y*: 16.01%
• 10Y*: 11.90%
• ALL TIME*: 10.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
2846.HK iShares Core CSI 300 ETF	HK$5.85M	HK$5.36M	HK$4.89M

2846.HK vs. 3070.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
2846.HK iShares Core CSI 300 ETF	6.74%	25.69%	14.25%	-11.18%	-27.18%	-1.25%	38.90%	33.16%	-27.08%	38.62%
3070.HK Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF	7.62%	25.91%	36.16%	12.21%	3.61%	4.52%	-12.13%	9.46%	-5.99%	54.37%

Correlation

The correlation between 2846.HK and 3070.HK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2012	0.41

The correlation between 2846.HK and 3070.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

2846.HK vs. 3070.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2846.HK

2846.HK Risk / Return Rank: 52
2846.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
2846.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
2846.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 42
2846.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
2846.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 67

3070.HK

3070.HK Risk / Return Rank: 26
3070.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
3070.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
3070.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 26
3070.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
3070.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2846.HK vs. 3070.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core CSI 300 ETF (2846.HK) and Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF (3070.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	2846.HK	3070.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	0.77	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.15	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.14	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	0.78	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.87	2.43	+6.44

2846.HK vs. 3070.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2846.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the 3070.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2846.HK and 3070.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

2846.HK vs. 3070.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2846.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.06%, which is greater than 3070.HK's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2846.HK and 3070.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	2846.HK	3070.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.06%	-33.58%	-17.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.05%	-15.30%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	-15.30%	-15.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.55%	-23.26%	-19.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.87%	-33.58%	-15.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.59%	-7.47%	-7.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.18%	-9.80%	-18.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	4.89%	-2.23%

Volatility

2846.HK vs. 3070.HK - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core CSI 300 ETF (2846.HK) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF (3070.HK) at 6.34%. This indicates that 2846.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3070.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2846.HK	3070.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.27%	6.34%	+2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.20%	11.74%	+3.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.70%	15.58%	+4.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.60%	19.13%	+4.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.88%	19.04%	+3.84%

2846.HK vs. 3070.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

2846.HK has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than 3070.HK's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

2846.HK vs. 3070.HK - Dividend Comparison

2846.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than 3070.HK's 3.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2846.HK iShares Core CSI 300 ETF	1.30%	1.39%	1.15%	1.60%	1.10%	0.84%	1.14%	1.33%	1.78%	0.93%	1.94%	1.73%
3070.HK Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF	3.83%	4.79%	3.93%	6.93%	8.04%	6.05%	4.20%	4.33%	4.86%	2.45%	6.13%	3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 2846.HK and 3070.HK in my portfolio?

2846.HK and 3070.HK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 2846.HK or 3070.HK?

On fees, 2846.HK is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 2846.HK or 3070.HK?

2846.HK is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for 3070.HK.

What is the main difference between 2846.HK and 3070.HK?

2846.HK tracks CSI 300 Index, while 3070.HK tracks CSI Hong Kong Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Ping An of China Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for 2846.HK and 0.77% for 3070.HK.