2800.HK vs. 3191.HK

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

2800.HK (Tracker Fund of Hong Kong) and 3191.HK (Global X China Semiconductor ETF) are both China Equities funds - 2800.HK tracks the Hang Seng Index while 3191.HK tracks the Factset China Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2800.HK returned 1.55%/yr vs 7.55%/yr for 3191.HK. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2800.HK charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for 3191.HK.

Performance

2800.HK vs. 3191.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (2800.HK) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2800.HK achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than 3191.HK's 71.39% return.

2800.HK

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 4.37%
• 6M: -4.32%
• YTD: -1.14%
• 1Y: 2.35%
• 3Y*: 12.90%
• 5Y*: 1.55%
• 10Y*: 4.65%
• ALL TIME*: 3.82%

3191.HK

• 1D: 11.82%
• 1M: -4.07%
• 6M: 47.98%
• YTD: 71.39%
• 1Y: 141.11%
• 3Y*: 36.31%
• 5Y*: 7.55%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
2800.HK Tracker Fund of Hong Kong	HK$19.24B	HK$19.19B	HK$19.22B

2800.HK vs. 3191.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
2800.HK Tracker Fund of Hong Kong	-1.14%	31.39%	22.40%	-10.55%	-11.90%	-11.96%	9.04%
3191.HK Global X China Semiconductor ETF	71.39%	41.08%	11.15%	-6.56%	-39.25%	19.31%	9.26%

Correlation

The correlation between 2800.HK and 3191.HK is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020	0.42

Return for Risk

2800.HK vs. 3191.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2800.HK

2800.HK Risk / Return Rank: 12
2800.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
2800.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
2800.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 12
2800.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
2800.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 12

3191.HK

3191.HK Risk / Return Rank: 92
3191.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
3191.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
3191.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 89
3191.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
3191.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2800.HK vs. 3191.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (2800.HK) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	2800.HK	3191.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	2.97	-2.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	3.24	-2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.43	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	5.23	-5.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.27	15.46	-15.18

2800.HK vs. 3191.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2800.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the 3191.HK Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2800.HK and 3191.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

2800.HK vs. 3191.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2800.HK drawdown since its inception was -63.92%, roughly equal to the maximum 3191.HK drawdown of -63.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2800.HK and 3191.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	2800.HK	3191.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.92%	-63.76%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.49%	-27.98%	+10.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.13%	-40.94%	+16.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.50%	-63.76%	+20.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.42%	-19.47%	+10.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.69%	-33.28%	+10.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	9.35%	-2.74%

Volatility

2800.HK vs. 3191.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (2800.HK) is 6.35%, while Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) has a volatility of 28.26%. This indicates that 2800.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3191.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2800.HK	3191.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.35%	28.26%	-21.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.44%	41.50%	-27.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.00%	49.32%	-30.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.78%	41.82%	-17.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.39%	41.22%	-19.83%

2800.HK vs. 3191.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

2800.HK has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than 3191.HK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

2800.HK vs. 3191.HK - Dividend Comparison

2800.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while 3191.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2800.HK Tracker Fund of Hong Kong	2.92%	2.98%	3.80%	3.78%	3.21%	2.85%	2.74%	3.27%	3.65%	3.09%	3.53%	3.67%
3191.HK Global X China Semiconductor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 2800.HK and 3191.HK in my portfolio?

2800.HK and 3191.HK have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 2800.HK or 3191.HK?

On fees, 2800.HK is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 2800.HK or 3191.HK?

2800.HK is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for 3191.HK.

What is the main difference between 2800.HK and 3191.HK?

2800.HK tracks Hang Seng Index, while 3191.HK tracks Factset China Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 2800.HK and 0.68% for 3191.HK.