2600.HK vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

2600.HK (Aluminum Corp of China Ltd) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

2600.HK vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Aluminum Corp of China Ltd (2600.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

2600.HK is traded in HKD, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2600.HK achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.56% return.

2600.HK

• 1D: -4.66%
• 1M: -6.84%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 6M: -5.64%
• 1Y: 146.26%
• 3Y*: 50.70%
• 5Y*: 23.66%
• 10Y*: 17.81%

^GSPC

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 8.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2600.HK vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
2600.HK Aluminum Corp of China Ltd	-9.29%	166.93%
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	8.56%	13.17%

Correlation

The correlation between 2600.HK and ^GSPC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

2600.HK vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2600.HK

2600.HK Risk / Return Rank: 91
2600.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
2600.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
2600.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 88
2600.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
2600.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2600.HK vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aluminum Corp of China Ltd (2600.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2600.HK	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2600.HK	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	1.90	-1.69

Drawdowns

2600.HK vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2600.HK drawdown since its inception was -94.16%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2600.HK and ^GSPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	2600.HK	^GSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.16%	-8.77%	-85.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.92%	-3.01%	-46.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.84%	-1.10%	-64.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	2600.HK	^GSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.88%	12.19%	+38.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.36%	12.19%	+38.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.93%	12.19%	+36.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 2600.HK and ^GSPC in my portfolio?

2600.HK and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.