PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2202.HK vs. 2007.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

2202.HK vs. 2007.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Vanke Co Ltd (2202.HK) and Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd (2007.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2202.HK achieves a -19.51% return, which is significantly higher than 2007.HK's -48.19% return. Over the past 10 years, 2202.HK has outperformed 2007.HK with an annualized return of -14.32%, while 2007.HK has yielded a comparatively lower -21.08% annualized return.


2202.HK

1D
-2.22%
1M
-16.19%
YTD
-19.51%
6M
-26.05%
1Y
-46.88%
3Y*
-35.97%
5Y*
-34.09%
10Y*
-14.32%

2007.HK

1D
-1.83%
1M
-20.37%
YTD
-48.19%
6M
-58.65%
1Y
-44.87%
3Y*
-47.19%
5Y*
-52.49%
10Y*
-21.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2202.HK vs. 2007.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2202.HK
China Vanke Co Ltd
-19.51%-37.88%-26.87%-50.85%-7.04%-27.52%-16.39%29.88%-11.06%83.28%
2007.HK
Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd
-48.19%-14.43%-37.82%-70.79%-60.42%-31.38%-8.47%38.50%-32.88%252.00%

Correlation

The correlation between 2202.HK and 2007.HK is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2014

0.58

The correlation between 2202.HK and 2007.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2202.HK vs. 2007.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2202.HK
2202.HK Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
2202.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2202.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
2202.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
2202.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
2202.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

2007.HK
2007.HK Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
2007.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2007.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
2007.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
2007.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
2007.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2202.HK vs. 2007.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Vanke Co Ltd (2202.HK) and Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd (2007.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2202.HK2007.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.88

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.67

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

-1.18

-0.27

2202.HK vs. 2007.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2202.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the 2007.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2202.HK and 2007.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2202.HK2007.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.11

-0.71

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.56

-0.72

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.29

-0.36

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

-0.26

+0.07

Drawdowns

2202.HK vs. 2007.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2202.HK drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, smaller than the maximum 2007.HK drawdown of -98.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2202.HK and 2007.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2202.HK2007.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.68%

-98.54%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.73%

-69.71%

+12.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.83%

-88.82%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.03%

-97.70%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.68%

-98.54%

+6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.35%

-98.50%

+7.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.81%

-63.00%

+23.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.31%

38.77%

-6.46%

Volatility

2202.HK vs. 2007.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Vanke Co Ltd (2202.HK) is 11.68%, while Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd (2007.HK) has a volatility of 22.47%. This indicates that 2202.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2007.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2202.HK2007.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.68%

22.47%

-10.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.00%

47.52%

-13.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.87%

65.41%

-22.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.59%

73.88%

-11.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.04%

59.14%

-8.10%

Dividends

2202.HK vs. 2007.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2202.HK nor 2007.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2007.HK
Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.45%8.04%5.65%4.79%7.18%1.84%3.38%7.80%
2202.HK
China Vanke Co Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%10.23%7.23%8.27%4.19%3.58%3.99%2.92%4.74%2.75%

Financials

2202.HK vs. 2007.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Vanke Co Ltd and Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


2202.HK and 2007.HK have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2202.HK and 2007.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer