21XJ.DE vs. CTEN.DE
21XJ.DE (21Shares Binance BNB ETP) and CTEN.DE (CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, 21XJ.DE returned 22.53%/yr vs 17.30%/yr for CTEN.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 21XJ.DE charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for CTEN.DE.
Performance
21XJ.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 21XJ.DE having a -29.43% return and CTEN.DE slightly lower at -30.10%.
21XJ.DE
- 1D
- -4.90%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- -29.43%
- 6M
- -32.15%
- 1Y
- -11.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEN.DE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -16.86%
- YTD
- -30.10%
- 6M
- -33.20%
- 1Y
- -35.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
21XJ.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
21XJ.DE 21Shares Binance BNB ETP | -29.43% | 6.81% | 124.46% | -2.70% |
CTEN.DE CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP | -30.10% | -19.43% | 96.51% | 53.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between 21XJ.DE and CTEN.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between 21XJ.DE and CTEN.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (3 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
21XJ.DE vs. CTEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
21XJ.DE
CTEN.DE
21XJ.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Binance BNB ETP (21XJ.DE) and CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 21XJ.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.89 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | -0.66 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | -1.10 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 21XJ.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | -0.76 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.35 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
21XJ.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 21XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.06%, roughly equal to the maximum CTEN.DE drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 21XJ.DE and CTEN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 21XJ.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.06% | -56.27% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.06% | -56.27% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.06% | -56.27% | +0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.01% | -55.40% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.87% | -19.06% | -8.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.08% | 33.71% | +0.37% |
Volatility
21XJ.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Volatility Comparison
21Shares Binance BNB ETP (21XJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) at 9.77%. This indicates that 21XJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTEN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 21XJ.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.53% | 9.77% | +3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.59% | 35.00% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.90% | 49.20% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.02% | 52.10% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.02% | 52.10% | +1.92% |
21XJ.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
21XJ.DE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEN.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
21XJ.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 21XJ.DE nor CTEN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
21XJ.DE and CTEN.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTEN.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTEN.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for 21XJ.DE.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for 21XJ.DE and 0.00% for CTEN.DE.
Find the right allocation for 21XJ.DE and CTEN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer