PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in 21Shares Binance BNB ETP (21XJ.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 21XJ.DE achieves a -29.43% return, which is significantly higher than CSSC.DE's -31.24% return.


21XJ.DE

1D
-4.90%
1M
-6.03%
YTD
-29.43%
6M
-32.15%
1Y
-11.77%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
10Y*

CSSC.DE

1D
-4.53%
1M
-16.01%
YTD
-31.24%
6M
-35.65%
1Y
-38.66%
3Y*
6.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
21XJ.DE
21Shares Binance BNB ETP
-29.43%6.81%124.46%-2.70%
CSSC.DE
CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP
-31.24%-35.55%50.17%86.11%

Correlation

The correlation between 21XJ.DE and CSSC.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023

0.70

The correlation between 21XJ.DE and CSSC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (3 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

21XJ.DE
21XJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
21XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
21XJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
21XJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
21XJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
21XJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CSSC.DE
CSSC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CSSC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Binance BNB ETP (21XJ.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


21XJ.DECSSC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.90

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

-0.65

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.39

-1.04

+0.64

21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 21XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is higher than the CSSC.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 21XJ.DE and CSSC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


21XJ.DECSSC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

-0.74

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.12

-0.03

Drawdowns

21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 21XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.06%, smaller than the maximum CSSC.DE drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 21XJ.DE and CSSC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


21XJ.DECSSC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.06%

-65.21%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.06%

-61.70%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.06%

-65.21%

+9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.01%

-64.95%

+10.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-28.09%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.08%

38.93%

-4.85%

Volatility

21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Volatility Comparison

21Shares Binance BNB ETP (21XJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) at 10.56%. This indicates that 21XJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSSC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


21XJ.DECSSC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.53%

10.56%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.59%

36.99%

-4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.90%

54.25%

-6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.02%

59.64%

-5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.02%

59.64%

-5.62%

21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

21XJ.DE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSC.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

21XJ.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 21XJ.DE nor CSSC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


21XJ.DE and CSSC.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSSC.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for 21XJ.DE.

They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for 21XJ.DE and 0.00% for CSSC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 21XJ.DE and CSSC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer