PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 18MM.DE achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than XCHA.DE's 17.26% return. Over the past 10 years, 18MM.DE has underperformed XCHA.DE with an annualized return of 4.44%, while XCHA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.50% annualized return.


18MM.DE

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.83%
YTD
4.12%
6M
4.12%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
4.44%

XCHA.DE

1D
1.97%
1M
4.81%
YTD
17.26%
6M
17.26%
1Y
46.27%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
9.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
18MM.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR
4.12%0.05%5.93%1.38%-7.30%14.57%-5.45%21.40%-6.44%10.50%
XCHA.DE
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
17.26%14.66%24.36%-14.24%-19.19%13.31%31.26%44.91%-21.79%18.93%

Correlation

The correlation between 18MM.DE and XCHA.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2012

0.46

The correlation between 18MM.DE and XCHA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

18MM.DE
18MM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
18MM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
18MM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
18MM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
18MM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
18MM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XCHA.DE
XCHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


18MM.DEXCHA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.49

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

7.75

-7.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.15

19.65

-18.50

18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 18MM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 18MM.DE and XCHA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 18MM.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.82%, smaller than the maximum XCHA.DE drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18MM.DE and XCHA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


18MM.DEXCHA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.82%

-52.27%

+15.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-5.94%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.52%

-26.34%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.20%

-37.05%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.82%

-38.54%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.65%

-0.96%

-2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-24.43%

+16.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.35%

+0.45%

Volatility

18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE) is 3.46%, while Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that 18MM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCHA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


18MM.DEXCHA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

6.82%

-3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

11.98%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

16.61%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

21.35%

-6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

22.21%

-5.66%

18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

18MM.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XCHA.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

18MM.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 18MM.DE nor XCHA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


18MM.DE and XCHA.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 18MM.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

18MM.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.

18MM.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XCHA.DE is China Equities. 18MM.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI Filtered PAB, while XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for 18MM.DE and 0.50% for XCHA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 18MM.DE and XCHA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer