PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1810.HK vs. VUAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

1810.HK vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1810.HK is traded in HKD, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1810.HK achieves a -33.33% return, which is significantly lower than VUAG.L's 9.02% return.


1810.HK

1D
1.39%
1M
-17.61%
YTD
-33.33%
6M
-39.01%
1Y
-49.81%
3Y*
33.79%
5Y*
-1.43%
10Y*

VUAG.L

1D
1.30%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
9.02%
6M
10.12%
1Y
24.80%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1810.HK vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
1810.HK
Xiaomi Corp
-33.33%13.91%121.15%42.60%-42.12%-42.81%206.59%1.32%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
9.02%17.84%24.57%25.94%-18.48%30.49%19.25%-11.33%

Correlation

The correlation between 1810.HK and VUAG.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1810.HK vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1810.HK
1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1810.HK vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


1810.HKVUAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.37

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

2.87

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

12.23

-13.74

1810.HK vs. VUAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1810.HK and VUAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

1810.HK vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1810.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, which is greater than VUAG.L's maximum drawdown of -38.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1810.HK and VUAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1810.HKVUAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.06%

-38.56%

-37.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.04%

-8.29%

-48.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.04%

-18.83%

-38.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.66%

-24.69%

-45.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.44%

-2.36%

-54.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.06%

-7.08%

-34.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.21%

1.95%

+31.26%

Volatility

1810.HK vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) at 3.28%. This indicates that 1810.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1810.HKVUAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

3.28%

+5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.27%

8.34%

+17.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.47%

11.38%

+24.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.12%

15.70%

+28.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.76%

19.15%

+26.61%

Dividends

1810.HK vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 1810.HK nor VUAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
1810.HK
Xiaomi Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


1810.HK and VUAG.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1810.HK and VUAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer