1810.HK vs. HBAR-USD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) is a stock, while HBAR-USD (HederaHashgraph) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, 1810.HK returned -1.43%/yr vs -16.81%/yr for HBAR-USD. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1810.HK vs. HBAR-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

1810.HK is traded in HKD, while HBAR-USD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HBAR-USD values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1810.HK achieves a -33.33% return, which is significantly lower than HBAR-USD's -25.87% return.

1810.HK

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -17.40%
• YTD: -33.33%
• 6M: -39.01%
• 1Y: -49.57%
• 3Y*: 33.79%
• 5Y*: -1.43%
• 10Y*: —

HBAR-USD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -17.66%
• YTD: -25.87%
• 6M: -36.52%
• 1Y: -50.94%
• 3Y*: 19.91%
• 5Y*: -16.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1810.HK vs. HBAR-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	-33.33%	13.91%	121.15%	42.60%	-42.12%	-42.81%	206.59%	15.42%
HBAR-USD HederaHashgraph	-25.87%	-60.37%	199.36%	137.68%	-87.06%	817.71%	210.09%	-97.55%

Correlation

The correlation between 1810.HK and HBAR-USD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2019	0.03

Return for Risk

1810.HK vs. HBAR-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1810.HK

1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6

HBAR-USD

HBAR-USD Risk / Return Rank: 61
HBAR-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
HBAR-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
HBAR-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 58
HBAR-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
HBAR-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1810.HK vs. HBAR-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	1810.HK	HBAR-USD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.43	-0.65	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.36	-0.80	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	0.92	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	-0.69	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.51	-0.98	-0.52

1810.HK vs. HBAR-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the HBAR-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1810.HK and HBAR-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

1810.HK vs. HBAR-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1810.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, smaller than the maximum HBAR-USD drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1810.HK and HBAR-USD.

Drawdown Indicators

	1810.HK	HBAR-USD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.06%	-97.59%	+21.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.04%	-73.44%	+16.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.04%	-79.15%	+22.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.66%	-92.56%	+21.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.44%	-84.44%	+28.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.06%	-74.50%	+32.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.21%	51.63%	-18.42%

Volatility

1810.HK vs. HBAR-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) is 9.01%, while HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD) has a volatility of 15.69%. This indicates that 1810.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBAR-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1810.HK	HBAR-USD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.01%	15.69%	-6.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.27%	43.64%	-17.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.47%	65.51%	-30.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.12%	90.98%	-46.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.76%	111.89%	-66.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1810.HK and HBAR-USD in my portfolio?

1810.HK and HBAR-USD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.