1810.HK vs. CSPX.L
1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) is a stock, while CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, 1810.HK returned -1.43%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for CSPX.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
1810.HK vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
1810.HK is traded in HKD, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1810.HK achieves a -33.33% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's 9.12% return.
1810.HK
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -17.40%
- YTD
- -33.33%
- 6M
- -39.01%
- 1Y
- -49.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.79%
- 5Y*
- -1.43%
- 10Y*
- —
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
1810.HK vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp | -33.33% | 13.91% | 121.15% | 42.60% | -42.12% | -42.81% | 206.59% | -16.56% | -22.17% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.12% | 17.68% | 24.61% | 26.72% | -18.58% | 30.05% | 17.10% | 29.86% | -8.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between 1810.HK and CSPX.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2018 | 0.20 |
The correlation between 1810.HK and CSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1810.HK vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
1810.HK
CSPX.L
1810.HK vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 1810.HK | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.36 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 3.11 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 13.05 | -14.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
1810.HK vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1810.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1810.HK and CSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1810.HK | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.06% | -34.04% | -42.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.04% | -7.76% | -49.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.04% | -18.61% | -38.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.66% | -23.90% | -46.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.44% | -2.29% | -54.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.06% | -3.65% | -38.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.21% | 1.86% | +31.35% |
Volatility
1810.HK vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 4.01%. This indicates that 1810.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 1810.HK | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 4.01% | +5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.27% | 9.04% | +17.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.47% | 12.03% | +23.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.12% | 16.04% | +28.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.76% | 16.21% | +29.55% |
Dividends
1810.HK vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 1810.HK nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
1810.HK and CSPX.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 1810.HK and CSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer