PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1475.HK vs. 9633.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1475.HK vs. 9633.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Nissin Foods (1475.HK) and Nongfu Spring Co Ltd (9633.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1475.HK achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly higher than 9633.HK's -6.13% return.


1475.HK

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.56%
YTD
-4.08%
6M
1.44%
1Y
2.74%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*

9633.HK

1D
-1.15%
1M
-4.63%
YTD
-6.13%
6M
-8.55%
1Y
12.88%
3Y*
2.16%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1475.HK vs. 9633.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
1475.HK
Nissin Foods
-4.08%24.24%-0.82%-4.43%15.30%-4.28%-26.67%
9633.HK
Nongfu Spring Co Ltd
-6.13%40.97%-23.43%4.31%-13.19%-5.81%65.86%

Correlation

The correlation between 1475.HK and 9633.HK is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2020

0.21

The correlation between 1475.HK and 9633.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nissin Foods

Nongfu Spring Co Ltd

Often compared with 1475.HK:
1475.HK vs. VOO

Return for Risk

1475.HK vs. 9633.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1475.HK
1475.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
1475.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1475.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
1475.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
1475.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
1475.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

9633.HK
9633.HK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
9633.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
9633.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
9633.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
9633.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
9633.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1475.HK vs. 9633.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nissin Foods (1475.HK) and Nongfu Spring Co Ltd (9633.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1475.HK9633.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.09

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

0.49

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.59

1.05

-0.47

1475.HK vs. 9633.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1475.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the 9633.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1475.HK and 9633.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1475.HK9633.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.42

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.06

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.18

+0.19

Drawdowns

1475.HK vs. 9633.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1475.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.81%, smaller than the maximum 9633.HK drawdown of -61.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1475.HK and 9633.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1475.HK9633.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.81%

-61.39%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-26.81%

+14.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.85%

-48.29%

+11.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-51.40%

+12.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.37%

-28.76%

+12.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.55%

-31.84%

+6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

12.26%

-8.55%

Volatility

1475.HK vs. 9633.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nissin Foods (1475.HK) is 4.84%, while Nongfu Spring Co Ltd (9633.HK) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that 1475.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 9633.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1475.HK9633.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

7.41%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.90%

24.01%

-7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.99%

31.03%

-8.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.25%

34.83%

-11.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.95%

37.35%

-5.40%

Dividends

1475.HK vs. 9633.HK - Dividend Comparison

1475.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than 9633.HK's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
1475.HK
Nissin Foods
1.37%1.31%2.64%2.43%2.18%2.35%1.83%1.53%2.03%
9633.HK
Nongfu Spring Co Ltd
2.64%1.75%2.42%1.71%1.20%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

1475.HK vs. 9633.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nissin Foods and Nongfu Spring Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


1475.HK and 9633.HK have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1475.HK and 9633.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer