9633.HK vs. 3690.HK
9633.HK (Nongfu Spring Co Ltd) and 3690.HK (Meituan) are both stocks. 9633.HK operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while 3690.HK operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, 9633.HK returned 1.87%/yr vs -23.61%/yr for 3690.HK. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
9633.HK vs. 3690.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 9633.HK achieves a -6.13% return, which is significantly higher than 3690.HK's -23.91% return.
9633.HK
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -6.13%
- 6M
- -8.55%
- 1Y
- 12.88%
- 3Y*
- 2.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- —
3690.HK
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -4.73%
- YTD
- -23.91%
- 6M
- -20.65%
- 1Y
- -45.57%
- 3Y*
- -13.54%
- 5Y*
- -23.61%
- 10Y*
- —
9633.HK vs. 3690.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9633.HK Nongfu Spring Co Ltd | -6.13% | 40.97% | -23.43% | 4.31% | -13.19% | -5.81% | 65.86% |
3690.HK Meituan | -23.91% | -31.91% | 85.23% | -53.12% | -22.49% | -23.49% | 23.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between 9633.HK and 3690.HK is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2020 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
9633.HK vs. 3690.HK — Risk / Return Rank
9633.HK
3690.HK
9633.HK vs. 3690.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nongfu Spring Co Ltd (9633.HK) and Meituan (3690.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 9633.HK | 3690.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.80 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | -0.89 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | -1.33 | +2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 9633.HK | 3690.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | -1.10 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | -0.42 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.02 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
9633.HK vs. 3690.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9633.HK drawdown since its inception was -61.39%, smaller than the maximum 3690.HK drawdown of -86.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9633.HK and 3690.HK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 9633.HK | 3690.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.39% | -86.14% | +24.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.81% | -50.61% | +23.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.29% | -65.65% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.40% | -81.05% | +29.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.76% | -82.59% | +53.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.84% | -48.63% | +16.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.26% | 33.40% | -21.14% |
Volatility
9633.HK vs. 3690.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nongfu Spring Co Ltd (9633.HK) is 7.41%, while Meituan (3690.HK) has a volatility of 16.17%. This indicates that 9633.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3690.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 9633.HK | 3690.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 16.17% | -8.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.01% | 31.27% | -7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.03% | 41.11% | -10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.83% | 57.82% | -22.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.35% | 57.16% | -19.81% |
Dividends
9633.HK vs. 3690.HK - Dividend Comparison
9633.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while 3690.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3690.HK Meituan | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
9633.HK Nongfu Spring Co Ltd | 2.64% | 1.75% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 1.20% | 0.40% |
Financials
9633.HK vs. 3690.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nongfu Spring Co Ltd and Meituan. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
9633.HK and 3690.HK have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 9633.HK and 3690.HK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer