1109.HK vs. MITEY

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

1109.HK (China Resources Land Ltd) and MITEY (Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — 1109.HK in Real Estate - Development, MITEY in Real Estate - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, 1109.HK returned 10.83%/yr vs 3.69%/yr for MITEY. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1109.HK vs. MITEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK) and Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR (MITEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

1109.HK is traded in HKD, while MITEY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MITEY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1109.HK achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly higher than MITEY's 6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, 1109.HK has outperformed MITEY with an annualized return of 10.83%, while MITEY has yielded a comparatively lower 3.69% annualized return.

1109.HK

• 1D: -7.34%
• 1M: -5.15%
• YTD: 21.56%
• 6M: 20.76%
• 1Y: 24.71%
• 3Y*: 2.74%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: 10.83%

MITEY

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 6.26%
• 6M: 6.63%
• 1Y: 35.03%
• 3Y*: 27.69%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: 3.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1109.HK vs. MITEY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1109.HK China Resources Land Ltd	21.56%	27.21%	-14.52%	-17.77%	14.83%	7.07%	-14.42%	33.98%	35.16%	36.06%
MITEY Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR	6.26%	76.02%	2.01%	6.03%	-6.63%	-13.89%	-15.55%	21.16%	-9.50%	-12.43%

Correlation

The correlation between 1109.HK and MITEY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2007	0.13

Return for Risk

1109.HK vs. MITEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1109.HK

1109.HK Risk / Return Rank: 64
1109.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
1109.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
1109.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 58
1109.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
1109.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 65

MITEY

MITEY Risk / Return Rank: 70
MITEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
MITEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MITEY Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MITEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MITEY Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1109.HK vs. MITEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK) and Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR (MITEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	1109.HK	MITEY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.07	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.71	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.20	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	1.21	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.66	3.19	-0.52

1109.HK vs. MITEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1109.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the MITEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1109.HK and MITEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

1109.HK vs. MITEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1109.HK drawdown since its inception was -70.02%, smaller than the maximum MITEY drawdown of -96.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1109.HK and MITEY.

Drawdown Indicators

	1109.HK	MITEY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.02%	-96.27%	+26.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.67%	-28.97%	+11.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.97%	-32.97%	-11.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.47%	-33.15%	-13.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.47%	-45.20%	-1.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.89%	-91.47%	+77.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.20%	-81.12%	+60.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.64%	11.03%	-2.39%

Volatility

1109.HK vs. MITEY - Volatility Comparison

China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK) has a higher volatility of 10.20% compared to Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR (MITEY) at 9.34%. This indicates that 1109.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MITEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1109.HK	MITEY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.20%	9.34%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.12%	25.37%	-1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.19%	32.78%	-1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.62%	28.38%	+13.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.81%	28.18%	+9.63%

Dividends

1109.HK vs. MITEY - Dividend Comparison

1109.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, while MITEY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1109.HK China Resources Land Ltd	4.14%	5.29%	7.03%	5.75%	4.73%	4.63%	3.73%	3.24%	3.31%	3.10%	3.32%	2.20%
MITEY Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR	0.00%	0.63%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.83%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1109.HK and MITEY in my portfolio?

1109.HK and MITEY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.