1908.HK vs. 1209.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

1908.HK (C&D International Investment Group Ltd) and 1209.HK (China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — 1908.HK in Real Estate - Development, 1209.HK in Real Estate - Services. Over the past 5 years, 1908.HK returned 10.57%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for 1209.HK. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1908.HK vs. 1209.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in C&D International Investment Group Ltd (1908.HK) and China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv (1209.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1908.HK achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than 1209.HK's -3.63% return.

1908.HK

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 3.74%
• YTD: 6.73%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 13.31%
• 3Y*: 1.28%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 28.05%

1209.HK

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -15.03%
• YTD: -3.63%
• 6M: -8.53%
• 1Y: 9.69%
• 3Y*: 6.58%
• 5Y*: 1.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1908.HK vs. 1209.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
1908.HK C&D International Investment Group Ltd	6.73%	30.36%	-15.37%	-21.68%	48.15%	46.80%	12.68%
1209.HK China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv	-3.63%	53.41%	9.22%	-27.95%	10.56%	1.46%	28.39%

Correlation

The correlation between 1908.HK and 1209.HK is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020	0.41

The correlation between 1908.HK and 1209.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

1908.HK vs. 1209.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1908.HK

1908.HK Risk / Return Rank: 52
1908.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
1908.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
1908.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 48
1908.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
1908.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

1209.HK

1209.HK Risk / Return Rank: 53
1209.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
1209.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
1209.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 47
1209.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
1209.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1908.HK vs. 1209.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C&D International Investment Group Ltd (1908.HK) and China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv (1209.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1908.HK	1209.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	0.36	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	0.75	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.09	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	0.65	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.02	1.91	-0.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1908.HK vs. 1209.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1908.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the 1209.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1908.HK and 1209.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1908.HK	1209.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	0.36	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.04	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.21	+0.53

Drawdowns

1908.HK vs. 1209.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1908.HK drawdown since its inception was -65.28%, which is greater than 1209.HK's maximum drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1908.HK and 1209.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	1908.HK	1209.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.28%	-60.10%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.28%	-18.85%	-14.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.48%	-47.70%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.16%	-60.10%	+2.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.99%	-17.65%	-6.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.50%	-27.86%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.09%	6.37%	+8.72%

Volatility

1908.HK vs. 1209.HK - Volatility Comparison

C&D International Investment Group Ltd (1908.HK) has a higher volatility of 14.47% compared to China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv (1209.HK) at 11.32%. This indicates that 1908.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1209.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1908.HK	1209.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.47%	11.32%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.20%	23.91%	+3.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.19%	33.75%	+2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.52%	47.22%	+0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.82%	48.77%	-6.95%

Dividends

1908.HK vs. 1209.HK - Dividend Comparison

1908.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than 1209.HK's 3.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1209.HK China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv	3.10%	2.99%	5.06%	3.62%	1.22%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
1908.HK C&D International Investment Group Ltd	5.71%	7.67%	9.95%	7.81%	5.27%	6.69%	14.56%	13.30%	4.49%	1.45%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1908.HK and 1209.HK in my portfolio?

1908.HK and 1209.HK have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.