100D.L vs. AEMU.L
100D.L (Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) and AEMU.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D)) are both exchange-traded funds - 100D.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while AEMU.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 100D.L returned 11.78%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for AEMU.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 100D.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AEMU.L.
Performance
100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
100D.L is traded in GBp, while AEMU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AEMU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 100D.L achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than AEMU.L's 26.98% return.
100D.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 21.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- —
AEMU.L
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 6.82%
- YTD
- 26.98%
- 6M
- 28.35%
- 1Y
- 54.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- —
100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 6.04% | 25.77% | 9.32% | 7.37% | 4.80% | 15.37% |
AEMU.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) | 26.98% | 25.36% | 8.44% | 1.48% | -7.40% | -10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between 100D.L and AEMU.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2021 | 0.28 |
The correlation between 100D.L and AEMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
100D.L
AEMU.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
100D.L
AEMU.L
Consumer Defensive
100D.L
AEMU.L
Industrials
100D.L
AEMU.L
Healthcare
100D.L
AEMU.L
Energy
100D.L
AEMU.L
Basic Materials
100D.L
AEMU.L
Utilities
100D.L
AEMU.L
Consumer Cyclical
100D.L
AEMU.L
Communication Services
100D.L
AEMU.L
Real Estate
100D.L
AEMU.L
Technology
100D.L
AEMU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
100D.L vs. AEMU.L — Risk / Return Rank
100D.L
AEMU.L
100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 100D.L | AEMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.60 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 5.79 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 18.66 | -10.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 100D.L | AEMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 3.32 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.70 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.63 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 100D.L drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, which is greater than AEMU.L's maximum drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 100D.L and AEMU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 100D.L | AEMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.63% | -25.31% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -11.09% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.06% | -15.46% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.06% | -24.24% | +11.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -2.35% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -9.98% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.62% | -0.98% |
Volatility
100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) is 3.98%, while Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that 100D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 100D.L | AEMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 8.04% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.52% | 15.71% | -6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 19.39% | -8.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.88% | 20.52% | -7.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 20.79% | -4.87% |
100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
100D.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than AEMU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Dividend Comparison
100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than AEMU.L's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 3.57% | 3.78% | 4.17% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 3.39% | 3.11% | 4.30% |
AEMU.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) | 1.53% | 1.94% | 2.50% | 2.42% | 2.87% | 1.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
100D.L and AEMU.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 100D.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
100D.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AEMU.L.
100D.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while AEMU.L is Emerging Markets Equities. 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while AEMU.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for 100D.L and 0.20% for AEMU.L.
Find the right allocation for 100D.L and AEMU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer