PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
100D.L vs. AEMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

100D.L is traded in GBp, while AEMU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AEMU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 100D.L achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than AEMU.L's 26.98% return.


100D.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.71%
YTD
6.04%
6M
8.26%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*

AEMU.L

1D
-1.61%
1M
6.82%
YTD
26.98%
6M
28.35%
1Y
54.81%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
6.04%25.77%9.32%7.37%4.80%15.37%
AEMU.L
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D)
26.98%25.36%8.44%1.48%-7.40%-10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between 100D.L and AEMU.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2021

0.28

The correlation between 100D.L and AEMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
100D.L
AEMU.L

Financial Services

24.5%
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

13.9%
2.7%

Industrials

13.7%
6.3%

Healthcare

13.6%
2.6%

Energy

11.7%
3.4%

Basic Materials

8.5%
6.0%

Utilities

5.3%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
8.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
5.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.0%

Technology

0.8%
42.0%

Financial Services

100D.L
24.5%
AEMU.L
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

100D.L
13.9%
AEMU.L
2.7%

Industrials

100D.L
13.7%
AEMU.L
6.3%

Healthcare

100D.L
13.6%
AEMU.L
2.6%

Energy

100D.L
11.7%
AEMU.L
3.4%

Basic Materials

100D.L
8.5%
AEMU.L
6.0%

Utilities

100D.L
5.3%
AEMU.L
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

100D.L
4.7%
AEMU.L
8.3%

Communication Services

100D.L
2.6%
AEMU.L
5.9%

Real Estate

100D.L
0.9%
AEMU.L
1.0%

Technology

100D.L
0.8%
AEMU.L
42.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

100D.L vs. AEMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

100D.L
100D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
100D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
100D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
100D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
100D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
100D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

AEMU.L
AEMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AEMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AEMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


100D.LAEMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.60

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

5.79

-3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

18.66

-10.60

100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 100D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the AEMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 100D.L and AEMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


100D.LAEMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

3.32

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.70

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.63

-0.10

Drawdowns

100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 100D.L drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, which is greater than AEMU.L's maximum drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 100D.L and AEMU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


100D.LAEMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-25.31%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-11.09%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.06%

-15.46%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.06%

-24.24%

+11.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-2.35%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-9.98%

+5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.62%

-0.98%

Volatility

100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) is 3.98%, while Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that 100D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


100D.LAEMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

8.04%

-4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

15.71%

-6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

19.39%

-8.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

20.52%

-7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

20.79%

-4.87%

100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

100D.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than AEMU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

100D.L vs. AEMU.L - Dividend Comparison

100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than AEMU.L's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
3.57%3.78%4.17%3.90%3.80%3.39%3.11%4.30%
AEMU.L
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D)
1.53%1.94%2.50%2.42%2.87%1.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


100D.L and AEMU.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 100D.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

100D.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AEMU.L.

100D.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while AEMU.L is Emerging Markets Equities. 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while AEMU.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for 100D.L and 0.20% for AEMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 100D.L and AEMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer