PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0Y8Z.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0Y8Z.L is traded in EUR, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0Y8Z.L achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than LCUK.L's 10.60% return.


0Y8Z.L

1D
-1.02%
1M
-0.23%
6M
6.94%
YTD
11.27%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
10Y*

LCUK.L

1D
0.60%
1M
2.57%
6M
6.92%
YTD
10.60%
1Y
22.61%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
0Y8Z.L
iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
11.27%24.83%8.63%15.41%1.14%
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
10.60%18.32%14.32%9.46%-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between 0Y8Z.L and LCUK.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2022

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0Y8Z.L
0Y8Z.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
0Y8Z.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0Y8Z.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
0Y8Z.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
0Y8Z.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
0Y8Z.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUK.L
LCUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0Y8Z.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0Y8Z.LLCUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.77

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.14

9.82

-1.68

0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0Y8Z.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0Y8Z.L and LCUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0Y8Z.L drawdown since its inception was -14.60%, smaller than the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -40.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0Y8Z.L and LCUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0Y8Z.LLCUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.60%

-40.90%

+26.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-8.11%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.60%

-15.94%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-0.65%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-5.62%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.30%

+0.30%

Volatility

0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0Y8Z.L) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) at 3.43%. This indicates that 0Y8Z.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0Y8Z.LLCUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

3.43%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

10.31%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

12.45%

+3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.99%

14.18%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.99%

17.14%

+1.85%

0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

0Y8Z.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

0Y8Z.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison

0Y8Z.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than LCUK.L's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
0Y8Z.L
iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.32%2.53%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
2.83%3.04%3.68%3.05%3.93%3.87%2.99%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


0Y8Z.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for 0Y8Z.L.

0Y8Z.L tracks MSCI EMU Net Index (EUR), while LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 0Y8Z.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0Y8Z.L and LCUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer