0UCF.L vs. XBLC.L
0UCF.L (iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and XBLC.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - 0UCF.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro-Aggregate: Financials Index while XBLC.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 0UCF.L returned 0.34%/yr vs -0.09%/yr for XBLC.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 0UCF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XBLC.L.
Performance
0UCF.L vs. XBLC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 0UCF.L having a 0.50% return and XBLC.L slightly higher at 0.52%.
0UCF.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 1.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.09%
XBLC.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 1.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- —
0UCF.L vs. XBLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0UCF.L iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 0.50% | 3.07% | 5.54% | 7.93% | -13.17% | 0.25% | 1.64% | 5.28% | -1.78% | 0.60% |
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.52% | 2.95% | 4.36% | 7.50% | -13.29% | -1.05% | 2.52% | 6.28% | -1.53% | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0UCF.L and XBLC.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017 | 0.29 |
The correlation between 0UCF.L and XBLC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0UCF.L vs. XBLC.L — Risk / Return Rank
0UCF.L
XBLC.L
0UCF.L vs. XBLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0UCF.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0UCF.L | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.10 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 0.58 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 1.95 | -0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0UCF.L vs. XBLC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0UCF.L drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, roughly equal to the maximum XBLC.L drawdown of -17.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0UCF.L and XBLC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0UCF.L | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.46% | -17.18% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.95% | -2.67% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.95% | -2.67% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.46% | -17.18% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -1.08% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -4.45% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 0.79% | +0.36% |
Volatility
0UCF.L vs. XBLC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0UCF.L) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) at 0.77%. This indicates that 0UCF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBLC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0UCF.L | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 0.77% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.18% | 2.72% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.98% | 3.06% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 4.39% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.94% | 4.68% | -0.74% |
0UCF.L vs. XBLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
0UCF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XBLC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
0UCF.L vs. XBLC.L - Dividend Comparison
0UCF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while XBLC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0UCF.L iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.18% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 2.42% | 1.00% | 0.75% | 0.98% | 0.55% | 1.10% | 1.12% | 1.52% | 1.70% |
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
0UCF.L and XBLC.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBLC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBLC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 0UCF.L.
0UCF.L tracks Bloomberg Euro-Aggregate: Financials Index, while XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for 0UCF.L and 0.12% for XBLC.L.
Find the right allocation for 0UCF.L and XBLC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer