PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0R2V.L vs. UC99.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0R2V.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc. (0R2V.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0R2V.L is traded in USD, while UC99.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC99.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0R2V.L achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly higher than UC99.L's 10.15% return.


0R2V.L

1D
0.66%
1M
9.81%
YTD
14.17%
6M
11.63%
1Y
53.84%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
20.57%
10Y*

UC99.L

1D
0.68%
1M
5.82%
YTD
10.15%
6M
11.64%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
15.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0R2V.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
0R2V.L
Apple Inc.
14.17%11.58%27.65%51.43%-27.27%31.16%89.32%87.43%-6.49%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.15%16.89%20.55%34.31%-24.11%27.47%20.00%37.86%-7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between 0R2V.L and UC99.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2018

0.53

The correlation between 0R2V.L and UC99.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0R2V.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0R2V.L
0R2V.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
0R2V.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0R2V.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
0R2V.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
0R2V.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
0R2V.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

UC99.L
UC99.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UC99.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC99.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC99.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UC99.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC99.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0R2V.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc. (0R2V.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0R2V.LUC99.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

2.36

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

9.63

+0.29

0R2V.L vs. UC99.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0R2V.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the UC99.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0R2V.L and UC99.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0R2V.LUC99.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.16

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.74

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.90

-0.08

Drawdowns

0R2V.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0R2V.L drawdown since its inception was -38.25%, which is greater than UC99.L's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0R2V.L and UC99.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0R2V.LUC99.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.25%

-31.53%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.00%

-11.92%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.60%

-21.57%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-31.53%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

0.00%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-5.24%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

2.93%

+2.55%

Volatility

0R2V.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc. (0R2V.L) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) at 3.17%. This indicates that 0R2V.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0R2V.LUC99.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

3.17%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.26%

9.81%

+8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.65%

13.05%

+11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.33%

17.38%

+15.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.98%

17.05%

+16.93%

Dividends

0R2V.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison

0R2V.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while UC99.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
0R2V.L
Apple Inc.
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.71%0.49%0.59%1.05%1.79%0.00%0.00%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


0R2V.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0R2V.L and UC99.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer