PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0R2V.L vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

0R2V.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc. (0R2V.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0R2V.L achieves a 21.94% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, 0R2V.L has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 29.28%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.09% annualized return.


0R2V.L

1D
0.00%
1M
12.35%
6M
30.01%
YTD
21.94%
1Y
58.32%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
18.88%
10Y*
29.28%
ALL TIME*
25.70%

^GSPC

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.76%
6M
7.25%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
13.09%
ALL TIME*
8.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0R2V.L vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0R2V.L
Apple Inc.
21.94%11.59%27.72%51.43%-27.27%31.16%89.32%87.38%41.87%2.21%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.73%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between 0R2V.L and ^GSPC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2014

0.30

The correlation between 0R2V.L and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0R2V.L vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0R2V.L
0R2V.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
0R2V.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0R2V.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
0R2V.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
0R2V.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
0R2V.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0R2V.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc. (0R2V.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0R2V.L^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.01

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

8.68

+0.82

0R2V.L vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0R2V.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0R2V.L and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0R2V.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0R2V.L drawdown since its inception was -38.25%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0R2V.L and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0R2V.L^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.25%

-56.78%

+18.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.99%

-9.10%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-18.90%

-11.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.88%

-25.43%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.25%

-33.92%

-4.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.19%

+2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-10.70%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

2.10%

+4.02%

Volatility

0R2V.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc. (0R2V.L) has a higher volatility of 9.37% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.13%. This indicates that 0R2V.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0R2V.L^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.37%

3.13%

+6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.33%

10.04%

+11.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.60%

12.62%

+26.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.03%

16.98%

+21.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.91%

18.06%

+19.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


0R2V.L and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0R2V.L and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer