PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0GZB.DE vs. ISTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0GZB.DE vs. ISTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) and iShares Strategic Metals ETF (ISTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0GZB.DE is traded in EUR, while ISTM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISTM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0GZB.DE achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than ISTM's 4.27% return.


0GZB.DE

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.61%
6M
2.55%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
37.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISTM

1D
-1.06%
1M
-6.48%
6M
-6.95%
YTD
4.27%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0GZB.DE vs. ISTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 0GZB.DE and ISTM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.68

The correlation between 0GZB.DE and ISTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0GZB.DE vs. ISTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0GZB.DE
0GZB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
0GZB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ISTM
ISTM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ISTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0GZB.DE vs. ISTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) and iShares Strategic Metals ETF (ISTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0GZB.DEISTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

1.62

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

3.53

+6.17

0GZB.DE vs. ISTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0GZB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the ISTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0GZB.DE and ISTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0GZB.DE vs. ISTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0GZB.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.71%, smaller than the maximum ISTM drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0GZB.DE and ISTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0GZB.DEISTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.71%

-19.50%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-19.50%

+7.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-16.44%

+12.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-6.72%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

8.93%

-5.08%

Volatility

0GZB.DE vs. ISTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) is 4.73%, while iShares Strategic Metals ETF (ISTM) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that 0GZB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0GZB.DEISTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

7.58%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

25.18%

-10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

30.00%

-9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

23.06%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

23.06%

-3.44%

0GZB.DE vs. ISTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

0GZB.DE has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

0GZB.DE vs. ISTM - Dividend Comparison

0GZB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.62%.


PositionTTM202520242023
0GZB.DE
BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISTM
iShares Strategic Metals ETF
14.62%14.78%29.62%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


0GZB.DE and ISTM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISTM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISTM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for 0GZB.DE.

0GZB.DE is categorized as Metals, while ISTM is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. 0GZB.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper (EUR Hedged), while ISTM tracks ICE Strategic Re-Industrialization Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for 0GZB.DE and 0.49% for ISTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0GZB.DE and ISTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer