PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0GZB.DE is traded in EUR, while ESAP.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ESAP.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 0GZB.DE having a 10.76% return and ESAP.DE slightly higher at 11.28%.


0GZB.DE

1D
0.84%
1M
3.24%
YTD
10.76%
6M
20.27%
1Y
40.22%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

ESAP.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
5.18%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.26%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
0GZB.DE
BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC
10.76%33.47%8.38%3.72%-11.58%20.19%21.59%3.35%
ESAP.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD
11.29%4.09%32.39%23.18%-14.49%41.14%7.12%3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between 0GZB.DE and ESAP.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0GZB.DE
0GZB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
0GZB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ESAP.DE
ESAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ESAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0GZB.DEESAP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

3.55

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.08

12.14

-0.06

0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0GZB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ESAP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0GZB.DE and ESAP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0GZB.DEESAP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.03

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.91

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.84

-0.22

Drawdowns

0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0GZB.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.84%, smaller than the maximum ESAP.DE drawdown of -33.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0GZB.DE and ESAP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0GZB.DEESAP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.84%

-33.74%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-7.14%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.85%

-22.82%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.84%

-22.82%

-9.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-0.42%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-4.99%

-5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.09%

+1.41%

Volatility

0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE) at 3.01%. This indicates that 0GZB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0GZB.DEESAP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

3.01%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.81%

8.64%

+8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

12.50%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.55%

15.93%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

17.80%

+2.69%

0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

0GZB.DE has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ESAP.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

0GZB.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 0GZB.DE nor ESAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


0GZB.DE and ESAP.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESAP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for 0GZB.DE.

0GZB.DE is categorized as Metals, while ESAP.DE is S&P 500. 0GZB.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper (EUR Hedged), while ESAP.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for 0GZB.DE and 0.15% for ESAP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0GZB.DE and ESAP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer