PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) and BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (TR) ETC USD (B4NB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0GZB.DE achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than B4NB.DE's 12.31% return.


0GZB.DE

1D
0.84%
1M
3.24%
YTD
10.76%
6M
20.27%
1Y
40.22%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

B4NB.DE

1D
0.86%
1M
5.31%
YTD
12.31%
6M
23.35%
1Y
44.74%
3Y*
20.76%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
0GZB.DE
BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC
10.76%33.47%8.38%3.72%-11.58%20.19%21.59%6.66%
B4NB.DE
BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (TR) ETC USD
12.31%35.19%9.85%6.07%-8.69%21.42%23.18%7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between 0GZB.DE and B4NB.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2019

1.00

The correlation between 0GZB.DE and B4NB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0GZB.DE
0GZB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
0GZB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

B4NB.DE
B4NB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
B4NB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
B4NB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
B4NB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
B4NB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
B4NB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) and BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (TR) ETC USD (B4NB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0GZB.DEB4NB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

3.98

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.08

13.73

-1.65

0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0GZB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the B4NB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0GZB.DE and B4NB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0GZB.DEB4NB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.26

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.43

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.60

+0.03

Drawdowns

0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0GZB.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.84%, smaller than the maximum B4NB.DE drawdown of -35.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0GZB.DE and B4NB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0GZB.DEB4NB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.84%

-35.46%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-11.18%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.85%

-16.40%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.84%

-31.07%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-2.07%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-10.79%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.25%

+0.25%

Volatility

0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) and BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (TR) ETC USD (B4NB.DE) have volatilities of 6.38% and 6.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0GZB.DEB4NB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

6.28%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.81%

16.26%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

19.68%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.55%

20.44%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

19.54%

+0.95%

0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

0GZB.DE has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than B4NB.DE's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

0GZB.DE vs. B4NB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 0GZB.DE nor B4NB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, 0GZB.DE and B4NB.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, B4NB.DE is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

B4NB.DE is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for 0GZB.DE.

0GZB.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper (EUR Hedged), while B4NB.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for 0GZB.DE and 0.99% for B4NB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0GZB.DE and B4NB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer