0FLE.L vs. T1AP.L
0FLE.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)) and T1AP.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Ultrashort Bond funds - 0FLE.L tracks the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note<5 Years Index while T1AP.L tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 0FLE.L returned 2.44%/yr vs 4.09%/yr for T1AP.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. 0FLE.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for T1AP.L.
Performance
0FLE.L vs. T1AP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0FLE.L is traded in EUR, while T1AP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the T1AP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0FLE.L achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than T1AP.L's 4.74% return.
0FLE.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- —
T1AP.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- —
0FLE.L vs. T1AP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0FLE.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | 1.42% | 2.69% | 4.89% | 4.20% | -0.49% | -0.51% | -1.77% |
T1AP.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.74% | -7.85% | 12.05% | 1.30% | 6.76% | 7.86% | 6,926.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0FLE.L and T1AP.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0FLE.L vs. T1AP.L — Risk / Return Rank
0FLE.L
T1AP.L
0FLE.L vs. T1AP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0FLE.L | T1AP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.19 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 2.00 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 4.68 | +5.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0FLE.L vs. T1AP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0FLE.L drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, smaller than the maximum T1AP.L drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0FLE.L and T1AP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0FLE.L | T1AP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -20.71% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.71% | -3.28% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.86% | -20.71% | +17.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.86% | -20.71% | +17.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -13.79% | +13.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -10.77% | +9.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 1.40% | -1.14% |
Volatility
0FLE.L vs. T1AP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L) at 1.38%. This indicates that 0FLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T1AP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0FLE.L | T1AP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 1.38% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | 4.71% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84% | 6.36% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.75% | 16.13% | -12.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.08% | 2,974.50% | -2,971.42% |
0FLE.L vs. T1AP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
0FLE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than T1AP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
0FLE.L vs. T1AP.L - Dividend Comparison
0FLE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while T1AP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0FLE.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | 4.72% | 5.04% | 6.01% | 5.52% | 1.49% | 0.58% | 1.60% | 2.96% | 2.07% | 0.36% |
T1AP.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
0FLE.L and T1AP.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, T1AP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
T1AP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for 0FLE.L.
0FLE.L tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note<5 Years Index, while T1AP.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 0FLE.L and 0.06% for T1AP.L.
Find the right allocation for 0FLE.L and T1AP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer