0FLE.L vs. FLOT.L
0FLE.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)) and FLOT.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Ultrashort Bond funds from iShares - 0FLE.L tracks the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note<5 Years Index while FLOT.L tracks the iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 0FLE.L returned 2.60%/yr vs 4.93%/yr for FLOT.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. 0FLE.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FLOT.L.
Performance
0FLE.L vs. FLOT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0FLE.L is traded in EUR, while FLOT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLOT.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0FLE.L achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT.L's 4.83% return.
0FLE.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOT.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 5.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
0FLE.L vs. FLOT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0FLE.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | 2.21% | 2.69% | 4.89% | 4.20% | -0.49% | -0.51% | -1.77% | 2.79% | -1.65% | -0.04% |
FLOT.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.83% | -7.29% | 13.41% | 2.86% | 8.18% | 8.12% | -7.69% | 6.54% | 6.15% | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0FLE.L and FLOT.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2017 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0FLE.L vs. FLOT.L — Risk / Return Rank
0FLE.L
FLOT.L
0FLE.L vs. FLOT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLOT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0FLE.L | FLOT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.18 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.81 | 1.72 | +3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 4.38 | +8.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0FLE.L vs. FLOT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0FLE.L drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, smaller than the maximum FLOT.L drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0FLE.L and FLOT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0FLE.L | FLOT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -13.04% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.71% | -3.64% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.86% | -11.16% | +8.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.86% | -11.16% | +8.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.04% | +4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -4.66% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 1.43% | -1.17% |
Volatility
0FLE.L vs. FLOT.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLOT.L) have volatilities of 1.57% and 1.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0FLE.L | FLOT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 1.52% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.14% | 4.53% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76% | 6.23% | -3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 7.96% | -4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 7.95% | -4.88% |
0FLE.L vs. FLOT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
0FLE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
0FLE.L vs. FLOT.L - Dividend Comparison
0FLE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, which matches FLOT.L's 4.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0FLE.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | 4.69% | 5.04% | 6.01% | 5.52% | 1.49% | 0.58% | 1.60% | 2.96% | 2.07% | 0.36% |
FLOT.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.68% | 5.02% | 6.05% | 5.50% | 1.45% | 0.60% | 1.59% | 2.91% | 2.21% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
0FLE.L and FLOT.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOT.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOT.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for 0FLE.L.
0FLE.L tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note<5 Years Index, while FLOT.L tracks iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist). Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 0FLE.L and 0.10% for FLOT.L.
Find the right allocation for 0FLE.L and FLOT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer