0FLE.L vs. FLOA.L
0FLE.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)) and FLOA.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 0FLE.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note<5 Years Index, while FLOA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 0FLE.L returned 2.44%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for FLOA.L. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. 0FLE.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FLOA.L.
Performance
0FLE.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0FLE.L is traded in EUR, while FLOA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLOA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0FLE.L achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLOA.L's 5.25% return.
0FLE.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOA.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- —
0FLE.L vs. FLOA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0FLE.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | 1.42% | 2.69% | 4.89% | 4.20% | -0.49% | -0.51% | -1.77% | 2.79% | -1.45% |
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 5.25% | -7.55% | 13.45% | 3.45% | 7.63% | 7.94% | -7.45% | 6.52% | 8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0FLE.L and FLOA.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2018 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0FLE.L vs. FLOA.L — Risk / Return Rank
0FLE.L
FLOA.L
0FLE.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0FLE.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.17 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 1.67 | +2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 4.18 | +5.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0FLE.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0FLE.L drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, smaller than the maximum FLOA.L drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0FLE.L and FLOA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0FLE.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -13.98% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.71% | -3.61% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.86% | -11.26% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.86% | -11.26% | +8.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -3.90% | +3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -4.65% | +3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 1.44% | -1.18% |
Volatility
0FLE.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) at 1.19%. This indicates that 0FLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0FLE.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 1.19% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | 4.59% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84% | 6.37% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.75% | 7.75% | -4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.08% | 8.05% | -4.97% |
0FLE.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
0FLE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
0FLE.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison
0FLE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while FLOA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0FLE.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | 4.72% | 5.04% | 6.01% | 5.52% | 1.49% | 0.58% | 1.60% | 2.96% | 2.07% | 0.36% |
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
0FLE.L and FLOA.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for 0FLE.L.
0FLE.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLOA.L is Corporate Bonds. 0FLE.L tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note<5 Years Index, while FLOA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 0FLE.L and 0.10% for FLOA.L.
Find the right allocation for 0FLE.L and FLOA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer