PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0941.HK vs. 0883.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0941.HK vs. 0883.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK) and CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0941.HK achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than 0883.HK's 19.57% return. Over the past 10 years, 0941.HK has underperformed 0883.HK with an annualized return of 5.35%, while 0883.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 18.72% annualized return.


0941.HK

1D
-0.06%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
3.19%
6M
-2.54%
1Y
-0.42%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
19.04%
10Y*
5.35%

0883.HK

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.33%
YTD
19.57%
6M
21.97%
1Y
44.24%
3Y*
39.61%
5Y*
34.47%
10Y*
18.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0941.HK vs. 0883.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0941.HK
China Mobile Ltd
3.19%13.20%26.39%34.44%21.03%13.23%-28.53%-9.29%-0.39%-0.36%
0883.HK
CNOOC Ltd
19.57%19.77%57.91%44.90%46.98%19.64%-40.48%13.63%12.79%21.28%

Correlation

The correlation between 0941.HK and 0883.HK is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2006

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between 0941.HK and 0883.HK has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0941.HK vs. 0883.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0941.HK
0941.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
0941.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0941.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
0941.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
0941.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
0941.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

0883.HK
0883.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
0883.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0883.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
0883.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
0883.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
0883.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0941.HK vs. 0883.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK) and CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0941.HK0883.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.27

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

2.65

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

7.00

-7.07

0941.HK vs. 0883.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0941.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the 0883.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0941.HK and 0883.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0941.HK vs. 0883.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0941.HK drawdown since its inception was -65.24%, smaller than the maximum 0883.HK drawdown of -74.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0941.HK and 0883.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0941.HK0883.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.24%

-74.17%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-17.17%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.77%

-30.80%

+18.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-30.80%

+14.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.33%

-56.59%

+7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-16.50%

+11.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.78%

-24.10%

-5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

6.43%

-0.29%

Volatility

0941.HK vs. 0883.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK) is 2.08%, while CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that 0941.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0883.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0941.HK0883.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

8.11%

-6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

24.22%

-15.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

28.40%

-17.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

29.79%

-12.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

31.86%

-11.60%

Dividends

0941.HK vs. 0883.HK - Dividend Comparison

0941.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than 0883.HK's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0883.HK
CNOOC Ltd
5.14%6.53%7.32%10.31%18.84%6.85%9.05%5.63%4.96%3.83%3.81%7.06%
0941.HK
China Mobile Ltd
6.44%6.41%6.53%7.16%8.95%7.24%7.36%4.45%4.52%3.62%3.27%3.32%

Financials

0941.HK vs. 0883.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Mobile Ltd and CNOOC Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


0941.HK and 0883.HK have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0941.HK and 0883.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer