0883.HK vs. 0941.HK

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

0883.HK (CNOOC Ltd) and 0941.HK (China Mobile Ltd) are both stocks. 0883.HK operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while 0941.HK operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, 0883.HK returned 18.72%/yr vs 5.35%/yr for 0941.HK. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

0883.HK vs. 0941.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK) and China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0883.HK achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly higher than 0941.HK's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, 0883.HK has outperformed 0941.HK with an annualized return of 18.72%, while 0941.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 5.35% annualized return.

0883.HK

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -4.33%
• YTD: 19.57%
• 6M: 21.97%
• 1Y: 44.24%
• 3Y*: 39.61%
• 5Y*: 34.47%
• 10Y*: 18.72%

0941.HK

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 3.19%
• 6M: -2.54%
• 1Y: -0.42%
• 3Y*: 15.94%
• 5Y*: 19.04%
• 10Y*: 5.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0883.HK vs. 0941.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
0883.HK CNOOC Ltd	19.57%	19.77%	57.91%	44.90%	46.98%	19.64%	-40.48%	13.63%	12.79%	21.28%
0941.HK China Mobile Ltd	3.19%	13.20%	26.39%	34.44%	21.03%	13.23%	-28.53%	-9.29%	-0.39%	-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between 0883.HK and 0941.HK is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2006	0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between 0883.HK and 0941.HK has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

0883.HK vs. 0941.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0883.HK

0883.HK Risk / Return Rank: 82
0883.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
0883.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
0883.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 79
0883.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
0883.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 83

0941.HK

0941.HK Risk / Return Rank: 38
0941.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
0941.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
0941.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 32
0941.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
0941.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0883.HK vs. 0941.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK) and China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	0883.HK	0941.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	-0.04	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	0.03	+2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.00	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	-0.03	+2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	-0.07	+7.07

0883.HK vs. 0941.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0883.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the 0941.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0883.HK and 0941.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

0883.HK vs. 0941.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0883.HK drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, which is greater than 0941.HK's maximum drawdown of -65.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0883.HK and 0941.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	0883.HK	0941.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.17%	-65.24%	-8.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.17%	-12.77%	-4.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.80%	-12.77%	-18.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.80%	-16.58%	-14.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.59%	-49.33%	-7.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.50%	-5.11%	-11.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.10%	-29.78%	+5.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.43%	6.14%	+0.29%

Volatility

0883.HK vs. 0941.HK - Volatility Comparison

CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK) has a higher volatility of 8.11% compared to China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK) at 2.08%. This indicates that 0883.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0941.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0883.HK	0941.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.11%	2.08%	+6.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.22%	8.75%	+15.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.40%	11.33%	+17.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.79%	16.90%	+12.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.86%	20.26%	+11.60%

Dividends

0883.HK vs. 0941.HK - Dividend Comparison

0883.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, less than 0941.HK's 6.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0883.HK CNOOC Ltd	5.14%	6.53%	7.32%	10.31%	18.84%	6.85%	9.05%	5.63%	4.96%	3.83%	3.81%	7.06%
0941.HK China Mobile Ltd	6.44%	6.41%	6.53%	7.16%	8.95%	7.24%	7.36%	4.45%	4.52%	3.62%	3.27%	3.32%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 0883.HK and 0941.HK in my portfolio?

0883.HK and 0941.HK have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.