PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0788.HK vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

0788.HK vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Tower Corp (0788.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0788.HK is traded in HKD, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0788.HK achieves a -14.07% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.54% return.


0788.HK

1D
3.11%
1M
3.11%
6M
-12.41%
YTD
-14.07%
1Y
-17.51%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.23%

^GSPC

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.72%
6M
7.84%
YTD
9.54%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
13.21%
ALL TIME*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0788.HK vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
0788.HK
China Tower Corp
-14.07%7.62%37.34%-2.01%-1.98%-24.37%-33.65%16.23%17.46%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.54%16.61%22.67%24.22%-19.31%27.58%15.74%28.20%-12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between 0788.HK and ^GSPC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2018

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


China Tower Corp

S&P 500 Index

Return for Risk

0788.HK vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0788.HK
0788.HK Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
0788.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0788.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
0788.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
0788.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
0788.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0788.HK vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Tower Corp (0788.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0788.HK^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.26

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

2.07

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

8.96

-10.38

0788.HK vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0788.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0788.HK and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0788.HK vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0788.HK drawdown since its inception was -68.64%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0788.HK and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0788.HK^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.64%

-56.80%

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.67%

-8.77%

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.67%

-18.97%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-24.92%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.82%

-2.14%

-51.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.90%

-9.26%

-35.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.62%

2.03%

+10.59%

Volatility

0788.HK vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

China Tower Corp (0788.HK) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.14%. This indicates that 0788.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0788.HK^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

3.14%

+3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.58%

10.04%

+3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.22%

12.61%

+7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.15%

16.97%

+10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.65%

18.03%

+12.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


0788.HK and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0788.HK and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer