PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0700.HK vs. RHM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0700.HK vs. RHM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK) and Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0700.HK is traded in HKD, while RHM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the RHM.DE values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 0700.HK having a -21.70% return and RHM.DE slightly lower at -22.66%. Over the past 10 years, 0700.HK has underperformed RHM.DE with an annualized return of 12.18%, while RHM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 39.13% annualized return.


0700.HK

1D
1.40%
1M
1.38%
YTD
-21.70%
6M
-23.86%
1Y
-8.04%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
-2.55%
10Y*
12.18%

RHM.DE

1D
-1.30%
1M
6.21%
YTD
-22.66%
6M
-25.39%
1Y
-30.55%
3Y*
74.90%
5Y*
70.44%
10Y*
39.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0700.HK vs. RHM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0700.HK
Tencent Holdings Ltd
-21.70%44.90%43.26%-6.79%-24.29%-18.77%50.62%19.98%-22.47%114.55%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
-22.66%188.71%103.03%61.75%115.85%-8.98%-4.31%31.97%-29.35%93.80%

Correlation

The correlation between 0700.HK and RHM.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007

0.17

The correlation between 0700.HK and RHM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (5 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0700.HK vs. RHM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0700.HK
0700.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
0700.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0700.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
0700.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
0700.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
0700.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

RHM.DE
RHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0700.HK vs. RHM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK) and Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0700.HKRHM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.91

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

-0.70

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.49

-1.53

+1.04

0700.HK vs. RHM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0700.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is higher than the RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0700.HK and RHM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0700.HK vs. RHM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0700.HK drawdown since its inception was -72.79%, smaller than the maximum RHM.DE drawdown of -77.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0700.HK and RHM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0700.HKRHM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.79%

-77.70%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.54%

-43.27%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.54%

-43.27%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.52%

-43.27%

-22.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.79%

-66.64%

-6.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.45%

-39.20%

+7.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-23.88%

+5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.56%

19.93%

-3.37%

Volatility

0700.HK vs. RHM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) at 11.77%. This indicates that 0700.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RHM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0700.HKRHM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.13%

11.77%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.71%

34.31%

-10.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.61%

45.58%

-15.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.19%

42.88%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.55%

38.74%

-3.19%

Dividends

0700.HK vs. RHM.DE - Dividend Comparison

0700.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than RHM.DE's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0700.HK
Tencent Holdings Ltd
1.14%0.75%0.82%0.82%0.50%0.38%0.23%0.29%0.31%0.16%0.27%0.26%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
0.95%0.52%0.93%1.50%1.77%2.41%2.77%2.05%2.20%1.37%1.72%0.49%

Financials

0700.HK vs. RHM.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tencent Holdings Ltd and Rheinmetall AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 0700.HK values in HKD, RHM.DE values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


0700.HK and RHM.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0700.HK and RHM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer