PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0363.HK vs. 1109.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0363.HK vs. 1109.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd (0363.HK) and China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0363.HK achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly lower than 1109.HK's 32.28% return. Over the past 10 years, 0363.HK has underperformed 1109.HK with an annualized return of 5.85%, while 1109.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.


0363.HK

1D
-1.99%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
2.83%
6M
-3.48%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
5.85%

1109.HK

1D
0.00%
1M
1.81%
YTD
32.28%
6M
21.31%
1Y
44.83%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0363.HK vs. 1109.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0363.HK
Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd
2.83%30.62%32.78%9.68%-7.36%16.47%-23.75%8.54%-25.64%10.84%
1109.HK
China Resources Land Ltd
32.28%27.21%-14.57%-17.77%14.83%7.07%-14.42%33.98%35.16%36.06%

Correlation

The correlation between 0363.HK and 1109.HK is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 1996

0.47

The correlation between 0363.HK and 1109.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0363.HK vs. 1109.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0363.HK
0363.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
0363.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0363.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
0363.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
0363.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
0363.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

1109.HK
1109.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
1109.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1109.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
1109.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
1109.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
1109.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0363.HK vs. 1109.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd (0363.HK) and China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0363.HK1109.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.91

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.37

5.99

-1.62

0363.HK vs. 1109.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0363.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the 1109.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0363.HK and 1109.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0363.HK1109.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.68

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.14

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.30

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.21

-0.03

Drawdowns

0363.HK vs. 1109.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0363.HK drawdown since its inception was -82.18%, smaller than the maximum 1109.HK drawdown of -90.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0363.HK and 1109.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0363.HK1109.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.18%

-90.82%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-17.67%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.61%

-44.00%

+23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.31%

-46.50%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.51%

-46.50%

-7.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.28%

-6.30%

-5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-35.30%

-11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.18%

8.50%

-2.32%

Volatility

0363.HK vs. 1109.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd (0363.HK) is 5.47%, while China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK) has a volatility of 11.28%. This indicates that 0363.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1109.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0363.HK1109.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

11.28%

-5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.36%

23.24%

-8.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

30.66%

-8.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.52%

42.15%

-18.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.05%

38.41%

-15.36%

Dividends

0363.HK vs. 1109.HK - Dividend Comparison

0363.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than 1109.HK's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0363.HK
Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd
6.43%6.53%7.94%9.49%9.95%8.80%6.91%6.75%6.06%4.11%2.62%3.98%
1109.HK
China Resources Land Ltd
4.00%5.29%7.03%5.75%4.73%4.63%3.73%3.24%3.31%3.10%3.32%2.20%

Financials

0363.HK vs. 1109.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd and China Resources Land Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


0363.HK and 1109.HK have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0363.HK and 1109.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer