PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
020Y.L vs. GLTS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

020Y.L vs. GLTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF (020Y.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

020Y.L is traded in EUR, while GLTS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLTS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 020Y.L achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than GLTS.L's 3.73% return.


020Y.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
-3.05%
6M
-2.14%
YTD
-1.53%
1Y
-4.31%
3Y*
-3.47%
5Y*
-10.94%
10Y*

GLTS.L

1D
0.71%
1M
1.94%
6M
2.57%
YTD
3.73%
1Y
4.92%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
1.15%
10Y*
0.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

020Y.L vs. GLTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
020Y.L
iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF
-1.53%-10.89%-5.04%7.85%-36.19%-8.42%1.97%
GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
3.73%-0.10%6.67%5.90%-10.58%4.46%1.92%

Correlation

The correlation between 020Y.L and GLTS.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

020Y.L vs. GLTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

020Y.L
020Y.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
020Y.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
020Y.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
020Y.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
020Y.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
020Y.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

GLTS.L
GLTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

020Y.L vs. GLTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF (020Y.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


020Y.LGLTS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.20

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

2.21

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

6.62

-7.72

020Y.L vs. GLTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 020Y.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 020Y.L and GLTS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

020Y.L vs. GLTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 020Y.L drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than GLTS.L's maximum drawdown of -26.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 020Y.L and GLTS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


020Y.LGLTS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.58%

-26.73%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-2.22%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

-4.42%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.47%

-15.53%

-31.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.12%

-9.85%

-38.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-13.57%

-19.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

0.74%

+3.17%

Volatility

020Y.L vs. GLTS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF (020Y.L) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) at 1.24%. This indicates that 020Y.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


020Y.LGLTS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

1.24%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

3.31%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

4.48%

+6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.03%

6.37%

+37.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.94%

7.06%

+33.88%

020Y.L vs. GLTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 020Y.L and GLTS.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

020Y.L vs. GLTS.L - Dividend Comparison

020Y.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, which matches GLTS.L's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
020Y.L
iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF
3.65%3.42%2.94%2.11%0.91%0.10%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
3.62%3.44%2.74%1.30%0.18%0.13%0.46%0.60%0.39%0.52%0.88%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


020Y.L and GLTS.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

020Y.L and GLTS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

020Y.L tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Eurozone 20yr Target Duration Index, while GLTS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 020Y.L and GLTS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer