PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0083.HK vs. UOLGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0083.HK vs. UOLGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Sino Land (0083.HK) and UOL Group Ltd ADR (UOLGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0083.HK is traded in HKD, while UOLGY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UOLGY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 0083.HK having a 15.67% return and UOLGY slightly higher at 15.96%. Over the past 10 years, 0083.HK has underperformed UOLGY with an annualized return of 5.25%, while UOLGY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.56% annualized return.


0083.HK

1D
-0.51%
1M
-9.18%
YTD
15.67%
6M
11.84%
1Y
52.36%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
5.25%

UOLGY

1D
-1.03%
1M
-6.75%
YTD
15.96%
6M
19.32%
1Y
59.54%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
9.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0083.HK vs. UOLGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0083.HK
Sino Land
15.67%38.55%-0.72%-7.04%6.90%1.15%-5.52%-11.93%3.29%23.79%
UOLGY
UOL Group Ltd ADR
15.96%75.55%-16.25%-1.77%-1.49%-8.63%3.47%34.11%-29.85%67.04%

Correlation

The correlation between 0083.HK and UOLGY is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.05

The correlation between 0083.HK and UOLGY shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0083.HK vs. UOLGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0083.HK
0083.HK Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
0083.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0083.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
0083.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
0083.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
0083.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

UOLGY
UOLGY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
UOLGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UOLGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UOLGY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UOLGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UOLGY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0083.HK vs. UOLGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sino Land (0083.HK) and UOL Group Ltd ADR (UOLGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0083.HKUOLGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.47

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.08

10.11

+0.97

0083.HK vs. UOLGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0083.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the UOLGY Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0083.HK and UOLGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0083.HKUOLGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.95

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.34

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.33

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.17

+0.07

Drawdowns

0083.HK vs. UOLGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0083.HK drawdown since its inception was -82.11%, which is greater than UOLGY's maximum drawdown of -74.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0083.HK and UOLGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0083.HKUOLGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.11%

-74.31%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-17.24%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-30.54%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

-30.98%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.56%

-42.59%

-1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.32%

-12.97%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.73%

-19.45%

-12.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

5.90%

-0.84%

Volatility

0083.HK vs. UOLGY - Volatility Comparison

Sino Land (0083.HK) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to UOL Group Ltd ADR (UOLGY) at 5.41%. This indicates that 0083.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UOLGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0083.HKUOLGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

5.41%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.79%

22.35%

-4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.26%

30.78%

-8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.05%

28.87%

-5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

29.42%

-5.32%

Dividends

0083.HK vs. UOLGY - Dividend Comparison

0083.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than UOLGY's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0083.HK
Sino Land
4.97%5.68%7.39%6.83%5.84%5.66%5.45%4.86%6.33%3.83%4.39%4.40%
UOLGY
UOL Group Ltd ADR
2.54%1.96%3.72%2.74%2.15%2.12%1.98%2.11%2.88%3.39%5.17%0.00%

Financials

0083.HK vs. UOLGY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sino Land and UOL Group Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 0083.HK values in HKD, UOLGY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


0083.HK and UOLGY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0083.HK and UOLGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer