PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0014.HK vs. AUCO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0014.HK vs. AUCO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Hysan Development Co Ltd (0014.HK) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0014.HK is traded in HKD, while AUCO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AUCO.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0014.HK achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly higher than AUCO.L's -7.93% return. Over the past 10 years, 0014.HK has underperformed AUCO.L with an annualized return of -0.97%, while AUCO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.45% annualized return.


0014.HK

1D
-1.57%
1M
-13.62%
YTD
-3.07%
6M
4.09%
1Y
32.87%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
-4.34%
10Y*
-0.97%

AUCO.L

1D
-1.40%
1M
-16.06%
YTD
-7.93%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
54.00%
3Y*
46.27%
5Y*
20.94%
10Y*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0014.HK vs. AUCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0014.HK
Hysan Development Co Ltd
-3.07%73.02%-16.52%-34.71%12.02%-11.40%-1.81%-14.95%-7.18%34.31%
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-7.93%182.37%17.35%15.01%-14.15%-9.64%21.17%43.38%-10.22%10.84%

Correlation

The correlation between 0014.HK and AUCO.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2008

0.09

The correlation between 0014.HK and AUCO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (10 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0014.HK vs. AUCO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0014.HK
0014.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
0014.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0014.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
0014.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
0014.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
0014.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

AUCO.L
AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0014.HK vs. AUCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hysan Development Co Ltd (0014.HK) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0014.HKAUCO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.70

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

4.45

+0.29

0014.HK vs. AUCO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0014.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0014.HK and AUCO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0014.HKAUCO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.17

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.55

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

0.41

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.20

-0.05

Drawdowns

0014.HK vs. AUCO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0014.HK drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, smaller than the maximum AUCO.L drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0014.HK and AUCO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0014.HKAUCO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.58%

-78.42%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.90%

-31.68%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.22%

-31.68%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.12%

-48.55%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.58%

-53.88%

-14.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.23%

-31.68%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.76%

-40.80%

+18.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.82%

12.10%

-4.28%

Volatility

0014.HK vs. AUCO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hysan Development Co Ltd (0014.HK) is 5.99%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a volatility of 15.15%. This indicates that 0014.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0014.HKAUCO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

15.15%

-9.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

36.67%

-15.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.93%

45.89%

-19.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.52%

38.18%

-12.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.27%

35.37%

-10.10%

Dividends

0014.HK vs. AUCO.L - Dividend Comparison

0014.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, while AUCO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0014.HK
Hysan Development Co Ltd
6.15%5.71%9.12%9.29%5.69%5.98%5.06%4.71%3.70%3.26%4.15%3.94%
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


0014.HK and AUCO.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0014.HK and AUCO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer