PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COV.PA vs. LMP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COV.PA vs. LMP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Covivio SA (COV.PA) and LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COV.PA is traded in EUR, while LMP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LMP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COV.PA achieves a -3.48% return, which is significantly lower than LMP.L's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, COV.PA has underperformed LMP.L with an annualized return of 0.50%, while LMP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.22% annualized return.


COV.PA

1D
-1.93%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
-3.48%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
5.76%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
-3.33%
10Y*
0.50%

LMP.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
1.06%
6M
2.24%
1Y
-4.67%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
5.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COV.PA vs. LMP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COV.PA
Covivio SA
-3.48%18.51%7.76%-7.99%-19.04%0.60%-19.00%26.14%-6.51%15.27%
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
-0.27%6.61%4.38%19.70%-39.81%36.68%-4.92%50.58%-3.51%20.35%

Correlation

The correlation between COV.PA and LMP.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2007

0.41

The correlation between COV.PA and LMP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COV.PA vs. LMP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COV.PA
COV.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
COV.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COV.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
COV.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
COV.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
COV.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

LMP.L
LMP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LMP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LMP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COV.PA vs. LMP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Covivio SA (COV.PA) and LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COV.PALMP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

-0.26

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

-0.25

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.97

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

-0.31

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.84

-0.55

+1.38

COV.PA vs. LMP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COV.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the LMP.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COV.PA and LMP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COV.PALMP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

-0.26

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.02

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.20

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.32

+0.05

Drawdowns

COV.PA vs. LMP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COV.PA drawdown since its inception was -77.24%, which is greater than LMP.L's maximum drawdown of -47.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COV.PA and LMP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COV.PALMP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.24%

-47.79%

-29.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.90%

-14.56%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-18.18%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.90%

-44.86%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-47.79%

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.15%

-19.62%

-12.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-12.23%

-7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.84%

8.09%

-1.25%

Volatility

COV.PA vs. LMP.L - Volatility Comparison

Covivio SA (COV.PA) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) at 5.66%. This indicates that COV.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COV.PALMP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

5.66%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.10%

14.39%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.32%

17.96%

+3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.82%

25.38%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.91%

25.98%

+3.93%

Dividends

COV.PA vs. LMP.L - Dividend Comparison

COV.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than LMP.L's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COV.PA
Covivio SA
2.82%1.79%6.77%5.05%6.76%4.99%6.37%4.55%5.34%1.09%3.72%1.58%
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
6.75%6.54%6.16%5.07%5.48%3.12%3.71%3.55%4.60%4.09%4.73%5.49%

Financials

COV.PA vs. LMP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Covivio SA and LondonMetric Property plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. COV.PA values in EUR, LMP.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


COV.PA and LMP.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COV.PA and LMP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer