PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XAL vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XAL vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Arca Airline Index (^XAL) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XAL achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ^XAL has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -1.44%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return.


^XAL

1D
-2.23%
1M
6.41%
6M
1.71%
YTD
9.49%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
-1.02%
5Y*
-4.58%
10Y*
-1.44%

^GSPC

1D
0.42%
1M
1.94%
6M
8.74%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
19.50%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
13.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^XAL vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^XAL
NYSE Arca Airline Index
9.49%4.77%-0.97%28.24%-35.29%-1.75%-24.45%21.28%-22.35%5.23%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.66%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ^XAL and ^GSPC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 1992

0.56

The correlation between ^XAL and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XAL vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XAL
^XAL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
^XAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XAL Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
^XAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XAL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^XAL vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Arca Airline Index (^XAL) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^XAL^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.30

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.28

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.74

9.88

-8.14

^XAL vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XAL and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^XAL vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XAL drawdown since its inception was -93.94%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XAL and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^XAL^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.94%

-56.78%

-37.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.62%

-9.10%

-22.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.81%

-18.90%

-21.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.23%

-25.43%

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.17%

-33.92%

-36.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.30%

-0.45%

-62.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.83%

-10.71%

-44.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.88%

2.09%

+11.79%

Volatility

^XAL vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

NYSE Arca Airline Index (^XAL) has a higher volatility of 13.43% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.25%. This indicates that ^XAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^XAL^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.43%

4.25%

+9.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.36%

9.96%

+22.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.53%

12.52%

+28.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.15%

17.00%

+21.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.21%

18.05%

+21.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


^XAL and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^XAL has higher volatility (13.43%) compared to ^GSPC (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^XAL dropped -93.94% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^XAL and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer