PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SPXHC vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SPXHC vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Health Care Index (^SPXHC) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^SPXHC vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SPXHC
S&P 500 Health Care Index
-5.29%12.53%0.90%0.30%-3.55%24.16%11.43%18.68%4.69%20.00%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-4.63%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SPXHC achieves a -5.29% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SPXHC has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.98%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.


^SPXHC

1D
1.94%
1M
-8.26%
YTD
-5.29%
6M
5.32%
1Y
0.48%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
7.98%

^GSPC

1D
2.91%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-4.63%
6M
-2.39%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SPXHC vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SPXHC
^SPXHC Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
^SPXHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SPXHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SPXHC Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
^SPXHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SPXHC Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SPXHC vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Health Care Index (^SPXHC) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SPXHC^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.03

0.90

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.16

1.39

-1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.21

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

1.40

-1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.23

6.61

-6.38

^SPXHC vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SPXHC Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SPXHC and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SPXHC^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

0.90

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.61

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.68

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.46

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between ^SPXHC and ^GSPC is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^SPXHC vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SPXHC drawdown since its inception was -40.78%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SPXHC and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^SPXHC^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.78%

-56.78%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-12.14%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.01%

-25.43%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.59%

-33.92%

+5.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.26%

-6.45%

-1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-10.75%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.02%

2.57%

+3.45%

Volatility

^SPXHC vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Health Care Index (^SPXHC) is 4.67%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that ^SPXHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^SPXHC^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

5.34%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

9.54%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

18.33%

-0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

16.91%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

18.05%

-1.47%