^N225 vs. URTH
^N225 (Nikkei 225) is an index, while URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, ^N225 returned 15.33%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for URTH. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
^N225 vs. URTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
^N225 is traded in JPY, while URTH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URTH values have been converted to JPY using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^N225 achieves a 31.15% return, which is significantly higher than URTH's 11.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ^N225 has underperformed URTH with an annualized return of 15.33%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.
^N225
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- 7.51%
- YTD
- 31.15%
- 6M
- 29.87%
- 1Y
- 74.50%
- 3Y*
- 25.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.33%
URTH
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 38.50%
- 3Y*
- 25.03%
- 5Y*
- 20.23%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
^N225 vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^N225 Nikkei 225 | 31.15% | 26.18% | 19.22% | 28.24% | -9.37% | 4.91% | 16.01% | 18.20% | -12.08% | 19.10% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 11.23% | 21.01% | 32.40% | 33.29% | -6.56% | 36.29% | 10.06% | 26.91% | -10.97% | 18.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^N225 and URTH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^N225 vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank
^N225
URTH
^N225 vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nikkei 225 (^N225) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^N225 | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.51 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.78 | 5.12 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.01 | 20.86 | -0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^N225 vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^N225 drawdown since its inception was -81.87%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^N225 and URTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^N225 | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.87% | -34.40% | -47.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.23% | -7.35% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.26% | -21.09% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -21.09% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.80% | -34.40% | +2.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -1.70% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.64% | -4.98% | -30.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 1.80% | +1.96% |
Volatility
^N225 vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison
Nikkei 225 (^N225) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 4.18%. This indicates that ^N225's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^N225 | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 4.18% | +4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.59% | 9.83% | +10.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.30% | 13.49% | +11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 18.67% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 20.48% | +0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^N225 and URTH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^N225 has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to URTH (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^N225 dropped -81.87% vs URTH's -34.40%.
^N225 currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^N225 and URTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer