PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GSPC vs. XDWF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GSPC vs. XDWF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

^GSPC is traded in USD, while XDWF.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDWF.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than XDWF.DE's 2.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ^GSPC having a 13.61% annualized return and XDWF.DE not far behind at 13.01%.


^GSPC

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.85%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
13.61%

XDWF.DE

1D
2.26%
1M
4.13%
YTD
2.03%
6M
4.46%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
24.11%
5Y*
12.65%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^GSPC vs. XDWF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.56%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%
XDWF.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C
2.03%30.25%26.42%15.97%-10.13%28.46%-3.30%26.43%-17.96%23.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and XDWF.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

0.54

The correlation between ^GSPC and XDWF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GSPC vs. XDWF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWF.DE
XDWF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
XDWF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GSPC vs. XDWF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^GSPCXDWF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.20

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.45

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

4.74

+6.63

^GSPC vs. XDWF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the XDWF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and XDWF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. XDWF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWF.DE drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and XDWF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^GSPCXDWF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.78%

-54.72%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-11.45%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-16.24%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-27.62%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-43.59%

+9.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

0.00%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-14.75%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.52%

-1.50%

Volatility

^GSPC vs. XDWF.DE - Volatility Comparison

S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) at 4.11%. This indicates that ^GSPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^GSPCXDWF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.11%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

11.30%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

14.33%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.82%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

20.24%

-2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


^GSPC and XDWF.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and XDWF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer