PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GSPC vs. MSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GSPC vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly higher than MSTR's -35.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC has underperformed MSTR with an annualized return of 13.09%, while MSTR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.94% annualized return.


^GSPC

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.76%
6M
7.25%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
13.09%
ALL TIME*
8.08%

MSTR

1D
3.13%
1M
-13.07%
6M
-43.69%
YTD
-35.62%
1Y
-76.89%
3Y*
30.85%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
17.94%
ALL TIME*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^GSPC vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.73%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-35.62%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and MSTR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 1998

0.46

The correlation between ^GSPC and MSTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GSPC vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GSPC vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^GSPCMSTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.77

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

-0.95

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

-1.38

+10.06

^GSPC vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and MSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, smaller than the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and MSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^GSPCMSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.78%

-99.86%

+43.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-80.70%

+71.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-82.63%

+63.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-84.11%

+58.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-89.27%

+55.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-79.36%

+77.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-86.43%

+75.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

55.87%

-53.77%

Volatility

^GSPC vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 3.13%, while Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a volatility of 25.51%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^GSPCMSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

25.51%

-22.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

60.54%

-50.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

74.28%

-61.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

90.77%

-73.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

74.27%

-56.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


^GSPC and MSTR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTR has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to ^GSPC (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GSPC dropped -56.78% vs MSTR's -99.86%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and MSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer