PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GSPC vs. BLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GSPC vs. BLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than BLDR's -24.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC has underperformed BLDR with an annualized return of 13.61%, while BLDR has yielded a comparatively higher 21.56% annualized return.


^GSPC

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.85%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
13.61%

BLDR

1D
-1.02%
1M
7.54%
YTD
-24.41%
6M
-28.31%
1Y
-32.40%
3Y*
-14.86%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
21.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^GSPC vs. BLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.56%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
-24.41%-28.01%-14.38%157.31%-24.30%110.02%60.61%132.91%-49.93%98.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and BLDR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2005

0.52

The correlation between ^GSPC and BLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GSPC vs. BLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BLDR
BLDR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GSPC vs. BLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^GSPCBLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.91

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

-0.59

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

-1.11

+12.48

^GSPC vs. BLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the BLDR Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and BLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. BLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, smaller than the maximum BLDR drawdown of -96.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and BLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^GSPCBLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.78%

-96.78%

+40.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-55.51%

+46.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-68.55%

+49.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-68.55%

+43.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-68.55%

+34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-63.16%

+60.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-47.87%

+37.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

29.23%

-27.21%

Volatility

^GSPC vs. BLDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 4.43%, while Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) has a volatility of 15.05%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^GSPCBLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

15.05%

-10.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

34.74%

-25.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

48.45%

-36.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

45.30%

-28.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

47.75%

-29.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


^GSPC and BLDR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLDR has higher volatility (15.05%) compared to ^GSPC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GSPC dropped -56.78% vs BLDR's -96.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and BLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer