PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GSPC vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GSPC vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's 19.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 13.45%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 42.38% annualized return.


^GSPC

1D
0.30%
1M
0.09%
YTD
8.18%
6M
8.17%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
19.88%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
13.45%

ANET

1D
1.38%
1M
10.32%
YTD
19.36%
6M
21.14%
1Y
60.82%
3Y*
56.72%
5Y*
47.39%
10Y*
42.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^GSPC vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.18%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
19.36%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and ANET is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.55

The correlation between ^GSPC and ANET shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GSPC vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GSPC vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^GSPCANETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.16

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.84

4.51

+7.33

^GSPC vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^GSPCANETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.15

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.01

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.95

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.83

-0.36

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^GSPCANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.78%

-52.20%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-28.33%

+19.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-50.42%

+31.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-50.42%

+24.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-52.20%

+18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-12.00%

+9.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-15.40%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

13.53%

-11.55%

Volatility

^GSPC vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 3.80%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 16.83%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^GSPCANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

16.83%

-13.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

40.41%

-31.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

53.48%

-41.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

47.20%

-30.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

44.99%

-26.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


^GSPC and ANET have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to ^GSPC (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GSPC dropped -56.78% vs ANET's -52.20%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer