iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO) belongs to the Precious Metals category. Below you'll find alternative ETFs from the same category, ranked by key criteria, plus funds that investors commonly compare with CGL-C.TO. Use the tables to find lower-cost options, better risk-adjusted returns, or a closer substitute for your current allocation.
Cheapest Alternatives to CGL-C.TO
CGL-C.TO charges 0.55% annually. There are 3 ETFs in the Precious Metals category with lower expense ratios, going as low as 0.28%.
| Symbol | Name | Expense Ratio | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 0.28% | — | Oct 2018 | CGL-C.TO vs KILO-B.TO | |
| Purpose Silver Bullion Fund | 0.36% | 164.90M | May 2016 | CGL-C.TO vs SBT.TO | |
| Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | 0.45% | 245.65M | Nov 2012 | CGL-C.TO vs MNS.TO | |
| iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.55% | 2.53B | May 2009 | CGL-C.TO vs CGL.TO | |
| Global X Silver Covered Call ETF | 0.60% | — | Oct 2025 | CGL-C.TO vs AGCC.TO |
Best Risk-Adjusted Alternatives to CGL-C.TO
CGL-C.TO has a PortfoliosLab risk / return rank of 35. There are 11 ETFs in the Precious Metals category with higher risk-adjusted ranks, going as high as 50.
| Symbol | Name | Risk / Return Rank | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 50 | — | Mar 2011 | CGL-C.TO vs SVR-C.TO | |
| Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | 48 | 245.65M | Nov 2012 | CGL-C.TO vs MNS.TO | |
| Purpose Silver Bullion Fund | 46 | 164.90M | May 2016 | CGL-C.TO vs SBT.TO | |
| iShares Silver Bullion ETF | 45 | 523.08M | Jul 2009 | CGL-C.TO vs SVR.TO | |
| Global X Silver ETF | 45 | 62.83M | Jun 2009 | CGL-C.TO vs HUZ.TO |
Top Performing CGL-C.TO Alternatives (YTD)
CGL-C.TO is at 4.39% YTD. No ETFs in the Precious Metals category have higher YTD returns; the top-performing alternatives shown here go as high as 4.14%.
| Symbol | Name | YTD Return | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 4.14% | — | Oct 2018 | CGL-C.TO vs KILO-B.TO | |
| iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 3.58% | — | Mar 2011 | CGL-C.TO vs SVR-C.TO | |
| iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | 3.35% | 3.59B | Mar 2001 | CGL-C.TO vs XGD.TO | |
| Global X Silver ETF | 2.35% | 62.83M | Jun 2009 | CGL-C.TO vs HUZ.TO | |
| Purpose Silver Bullion Fund | 2.24% | 164.90M | May 2016 | CGL-C.TO vs SBT.TO |
Lowest Volatility Alternatives to CGL-C.TO
CGL-C.TO has 25.35% 1-year volatility. There is 1 ETF in the Precious Metals category with lower 1-year volatility, going as low as 25.07%.
| Symbol | Name | Volatility 1Y | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 25.07% | — | Oct 2018 | CGL-C.TO vs KILO-B.TO | |
| iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 26.89% | 2.53B | May 2009 | CGL-C.TO vs CGL.TO | |
| CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | 39.82% | 247.50M | Mar 2022 | CGL-C.TO vs CGXF.TO | |
| iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | 42.86% | 3.59B | Mar 2001 | CGL-C.TO vs XGD.TO | |
| RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | 42.98% | — | Mar 2023 | CGL-C.TO vs RGPM.NEO |
Lowest Drawdown Alternatives to CGL-C.TO
CGL-C.TO has a 1-year max drawdown of -17.37%. No ETFs in the Precious Metals category have shallower 1-year drawdowns; the lowest-drawdown alternatives shown here go as shallow as -17.41%.
| Symbol | Name | Max Drawdown 1Y | AUM | Inception | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | -17.41% | — | Oct 2018 | CGL-C.TO vs KILO-B.TO | |
| iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -19.36% | 2.53B | May 2009 | CGL-C.TO vs CGL.TO | |
| CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | -27.39% | 247.50M | Mar 2022 | CGL-C.TO vs CGXF.TO | |
| iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | -28.95% | 3.59B | Mar 2001 | CGL-C.TO vs XGD.TO | |
| RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | -29.46% | — | Mar 2023 | CGL-C.TO vs RGPM.NEO |
Other ETFs from iShares
The 10 most viewed iShares ETFs shown here include XEQT.TO, XDIV.TO, XEI.TO and span 8 categories. AUM among these funds goes as high as $30B.
Often Compared With CGL-C.TO
Investors most often compare CGL-C.TO with MNT.TO, GLD, PHYS.TO. These 20 comparison targets span 10 categories, based on PortfoliosLab usage data.
Compare CGL-C.TO with Any Fund or Stock
Compare CGL-C.TO with any ETF, mutual fund, or stock using PortfoliosLab's comparison tool.
Pair CGL-C.TO with funds that move differently
iShares Gold Bullion ETF alternatives help with substitution. Diversifiers are the next step when you want funds with lower historical correlation to CGL-C.TO.
Explore CGL-C.TO Diversifiers