IGLN.L vs. VUAA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF (VUAA.DE).
IGLN.L and VUAA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. VUAA.DE is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 14, 2019. Both IGLN.L and VUAA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IGLN.L vs. VUAA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGLN.L vs. VUAA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 10.91% | 64.92% | 26.14% | 13.44% | -0.09% | -4.03% | 21.68% |
VUAA.DE Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF | -4.23% | 18.18% | 24.76% | 26.39% | -19.02% | 29.66% | 14.83% |
Different Trading Currencies
IGLN.L is traded in USD, while VUAA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VUAA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than VUAA.DE's -4.23% return.
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 23.69%
- 1Y
- 52.73%
- 3Y*
- 34.04%
- 5Y*
- 22.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.51%
VUAA.DE
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGLN.L vs. VUAA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IGLN.L vs. VUAA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IGLN.L
VUAA.DE
IGLN.L vs. VUAA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF (VUAA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLN.L | VUAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 1.09 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 1.59 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 1.92 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 8.26 | +3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLN.L | VUAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.09 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.31 | 0.73 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.71 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLN.L and VUAA.DE is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IGLN.L vs. VUAA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLN.L nor VUAA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IGLN.L vs. VUAA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.24%, which is greater than VUAA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and VUAA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLN.L | VUAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.24% | -33.67% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.36% | -13.45% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | -23.33% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.80% | -5.19% | -4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -5.18% | -14.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 2.31% | +2.27% |
Volatility
IGLN.L vs. VUAA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF (VUAA.DE) at 4.45%. This indicates that IGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGLN.L | VUAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 4.45% | +7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.21% | 8.77% | +13.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.25% | 16.89% | +9.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 15.90% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 18.54% | -3.13% |