PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ChatGPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in ChatGPT, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Oct 1, 2018, corresponding to the inception date of LIN

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-0.11%2.78%-0.42%4.03%27.10%18.38%10.55%12.70%
Portfolio
ChatGPT
0.11%5.04%7.99%14.64%44.64%34.78%24.62%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-0.00%4.14%-4.10%6.40%32.03%18.01%14.99%26.40%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
2.57%4.65%1.15%3.00%70.08%90.83%67.37%71.10%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
2.02%14.79%3.28%10.17%28.94%33.62%7.17%22.97%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
-0.21%4.73%0.68%33.12%98.75%44.22%22.73%23.96%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-0.15%9.88%-2.90%3.98%33.74%37.18%17.61%21.17%
V
Visa Inc.
-1.27%-0.91%-13.04%-11.07%-8.03%10.87%7.25%15.32%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
-1.02%-3.64%2.01%-1.66%-10.64%1.32%3.84%8.70%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
-3.25%-0.99%15.94%7.66%4.21%27.76%23.76%22.92%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
0.46%13.93%38.34%61.77%173.14%55.54%30.31%29.38%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
-0.42%1.40%17.99%14.41%47.21%9.44%6.56%15.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 2, 2018, ChatGPT's average daily return is +0.10%, while the average monthly return is +2.07%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.8 years.

Historically, 68% of months were positive and 32% were negative. The best month was Jul 2022 with a return of +12.7%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -12.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, ChatGPT closed higher 57% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +10.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -11.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.44%0.77%-2.17%4.88%7.99%
20252.64%-0.77%-5.98%-2.76%7.45%4.64%3.95%3.17%3.99%5.57%-0.33%-0.40%22.37%
20243.91%8.13%5.31%-1.03%8.31%3.75%0.39%1.83%1.36%0.76%6.66%-1.48%44.39%
202310.60%-0.45%7.84%2.43%5.54%7.16%4.93%0.11%-5.26%-2.62%8.48%4.96%51.78%
2022-5.83%-0.92%7.08%-12.76%0.13%-9.63%12.72%-5.62%-10.90%9.67%7.40%-7.49%-18.54%
2021-1.32%3.63%3.29%6.79%0.53%5.09%2.36%4.50%-4.46%8.49%4.86%2.13%41.49%

Benchmark Metrics

ChatGPT has an annualized alpha of 12.03%, beta of 1.06, and R² of 0.92 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 02, 2018.

  • This portfolio captured 142.26% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 90.81% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 12.03% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 1.06 and R² of 0.92, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
12.03%
Beta
1.06
0.92
Upside Capture
142.26%
Downside Capture
90.81%

Expense Ratio

ChatGPT has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

ChatGPT ranks 94 for risk / return — in the top 94% of portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.


ChatGPT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ChatGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ChatGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ChatGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ChatGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ChatGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.62

2.23

+1.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.85

3.12

+1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.42

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.44

4.05

+5.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

33.61

17.91

+15.70


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AAPL
Apple Inc
751.572.321.303.759.07
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
812.192.751.344.7511.78
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
601.011.591.201.834.36
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
933.754.651.595.6020.65
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
751.832.401.322.958.07
V
Visa Inc.
24-0.27-0.220.97-0.03-0.06
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
17-0.49-0.580.93-0.33-0.62
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
370.220.451.050.541.08
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
985.666.201.8113.8847.70
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
791.922.461.344.7611.54

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

ChatGPT Sharpe ratios as of Apr 11, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 3.62
  • 5-Year: 1.28
  • All Time: 1.18

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 2.14 to 3.05, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of ChatGPT compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

ChatGPT provided a 1.05% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.05%1.15%1.16%1.36%1.16%1.12%1.57%1.28%1.45%1.51%1.44%1.96%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.40%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.27%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.90%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%
V
Visa Inc.
0.83%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.91%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.52%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
0.75%1.02%1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.47%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the ChatGPT. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the ChatGPT was 29.58%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 52 trading sessions.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-29.58%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202052Jun 5, 202075
-26.76%Mar 30, 2022128Sep 30, 2022158May 18, 2023286
-24.08%Oct 4, 201856Dec 24, 201881Apr 23, 2019137
-19.6%Feb 20, 202534Apr 8, 202557Jul 1, 202591
-12.03%Sep 3, 202014Sep 23, 202038Nov 16, 202052

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 12 assets, with an effective number of assets of 11.06, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests that the portfolio's investments are spread across a variety of assets, indicating a well-diversified allocation. However, true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkPGNEECVXCOSTCATJPMNVDALINAMZNVGOOGAAPLPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.320.360.400.540.620.620.680.590.680.660.710.710.93
PG0.321.000.430.120.380.160.200.060.380.150.340.180.250.29
NEE0.360.431.000.180.280.170.190.120.330.180.260.220.240.34
CVX0.400.120.181.000.150.510.450.180.340.140.290.220.220.39
COST0.540.380.280.151.000.240.240.370.400.410.410.380.430.55
CAT0.620.160.170.510.241.000.600.350.440.300.400.350.330.57
JPM0.620.200.190.450.240.601.000.320.440.300.460.350.340.56
NVDA0.680.060.120.180.370.350.321.000.320.590.390.540.540.78
LIN0.590.380.330.340.400.440.440.321.000.310.500.370.390.56
AMZN0.680.150.180.140.410.300.300.590.311.000.430.660.580.75
V0.660.340.260.290.410.400.460.390.500.431.000.480.480.63
GOOG0.710.180.220.220.380.350.350.540.370.660.481.000.590.76
AAPL0.710.250.240.220.430.330.340.540.390.580.480.591.000.75
Portfolio0.930.290.340.390.550.570.560.780.560.750.630.760.751.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 2, 2018