Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
LKOH.ME PJSC LUKOIL | Energy | 23% |
SBER.ME Sberbank of Russia | Financial Services | 20% |
BELU.ME Beluga Group PAO | Consumer Defensive | 11% |
SIBN.ME Gazprom Neft | Energy | 9% |
TATN.ME PJSC Tatneft | Energy | 9% |
CHMF.ME PAO Severstal | Basic Materials | 7% |
NLMK.ME Public Joint Stock Company "Novolipetsk Steel" | Basic Materials | 7% |
BSPB.ME "Bank "Saint-Petersburg" Public Joint-Stock Company | Financial Services | 7% |
GCHE.ME Public Joint Stock Company "Cherkizovo Group" | Consumer Defensive | 7% |
Find the right asset allocation for 1.1.1 (new)
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 1.1.1 (new), comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of Jun 13, 2026, the 1.1.1 (new) returned 3.41% Year-To-Date and 24.98% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.50% | -0.93% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 24.33% | 19.37% | 11.84% | 13.61% |
Portfolio 1.1.1 (new) | -0.24% | -5.54% | 3.41% | 3.96% | 1.09% | 21.63% | 18.87% | 24.98% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
BELU.ME Beluga Group PAO | -1.66% | -13.82% | -19.15% | -20.00% | -21.39% | 37.39% | 28.59% | 36.96% |
BSPB.ME "Bank "Saint-Petersburg" Public Joint-Stock Company | 0.43% | -7.56% | 11.52% | 7.70% | 0.69% | 44.41% | 50.92% | 27.61% |
CHMF.ME PAO Severstal | 0.45% | -8.47% | -21.65% | -20.40% | -23.62% | -2.18% | -9.69% | 10.56% |
GCHE.ME Public Joint Stock Company "Cherkizovo Group" | -0.18% | -6.29% | 13.28% | 9.88% | 7.15% | 13.37% | 12.86% | 19.25% |
LKOH.ME PJSC LUKOIL | -0.19% | -7.85% | -0.38% | 5.02% | -4.66% | 17.37% | 9.25% | 17.47% |
NLMK.ME Public Joint Stock Company "Novolipetsk Steel" | 1.35% | -14.23% | -25.18% | -24.23% | -28.09% | -18.31% | -20.95% | 5.29% |
SBER.ME Sberbank of Russia | -0.23% | 0.45% | 26.45% | 25.66% | 36.04% | 22.91% | 4.62% | 12.28% |
SIBN.ME Gazprom Neft | 0.09% | -4.04% | 9.40% | 10.20% | 12.17% | 13.90% | 16.59% | 21.45% |
TATN.ME PJSC Tatneft | -1.31% | 0.11% | 14.66% | 12.28% | 9.53% | 28.12% | 15.64% | 16.45% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Mar 3, 2010, 1.1.1 (new)'s average daily return is +0.09%, while the average monthly return is +1.88%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.1 years.
Historically, 60% of months were positive and 40% were negative. The best month was Mar 2010 with a return of +85.9%, while the worst month was Feb 2022 at -37.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 12 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 7 months.
On a daily basis, 1.1.1 (new) closed higher 52% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 3, 2010 with a return of +78.0%, while the worst single day was Feb 24, 2022 at -28.6%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 7.15% | -1.83% | -3.52% | 3.93% | 2.37% | -4.23% | 3.41% | ||||||
| 2025 | 11.46% | 16.54% | 3.21% | -2.94% | 3.47% | 0.17% | -4.19% | 5.20% | -11.05% | -1.71% | 9.97% | -2.24% | 27.79% |
| 2024 | 6.50% | 0.83% | 2.64% | 3.14% | 3.54% | 7.13% | -5.78% | -14.94% | 6.59% | -13.28% | -8.95% | 10.07% | -6.40% |
| 2023 | 10.68% | -2.78% | 12.94% | 27.83% | 3.90% | -5.70% | 11.87% | 7.15% | 8.85% | 5.81% | 3.08% | 7.32% | 132.48% |
| 2022 | -6.54% | -37.53% | 20.90% | 2.99% | -1.48% | 16.24% | -11.46% | 11.76% | -15.35% | 24.04% | 3.42% | -13.03% | -22.20% |
| 2021 | -0.53% | 9.81% | 20.24% | 0.07% | 6.28% | 0.34% | 0.25% | 5.07% | 5.23% | 11.89% | -13.48% | 1.93% | 53.27% |
Benchmark Metrics
1.1.1 (new) has an annualized alpha of 15.49%, beta of 0.57, and R2 of 0.06 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since March 03, 2010.
- This portfolio captured 116.86% of S&P 500 Index gains and 105.31% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- Beta of 0.57 may look defensive, but with R2 of 0.06 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index - low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
- R2 of 0.06 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 15.49%
- Beta
- 0.57
- R²
- 0.06
- Upside Capture
- 116.86%
- Downside Capture
- 105.31%
Expense Ratio
1.1.1 (new) has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
1.1.1 (new) ranks 5 for risk / return — in the bottom 5% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1.1.1 (new) and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.09 | 1.86 | -1.78 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.31 | 2.53 | -2.22 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.34 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 2.53 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | 11.37 | -11.11 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BELU.ME Beluga Group PAO | 9 | -0.82 | -1.06 | 0.89 | -0.82 | -1.93 |
BSPB.ME "Bank "Saint-Petersburg" Public Joint-Stock Company | 40 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 1.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
CHMF.ME PAO Severstal | 13 | -0.76 | -1.00 | 0.90 | -0.73 | -1.40 |
GCHE.ME Public Joint Stock Company "Cherkizovo Group" | 48 | 0.24 | 0.56 | 1.06 | 0.30 | 0.71 |
LKOH.ME PJSC LUKOIL | 33 | -0.15 | 0.01 | 1.00 | -0.20 | -0.54 |
NLMK.ME Public Joint Stock Company "Novolipetsk Steel" | 10 | -0.88 | -1.25 | 0.88 | -0.77 | -1.51 |
SBER.ME Sberbank of Russia | 81 | 1.49 | 2.25 | 1.25 | 2.68 | 7.27 |
SIBN.ME Gazprom Neft | 57 | 0.50 | 0.89 | 1.09 | 0.95 | 2.11 |
TATN.ME PJSC Tatneft | 50 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 1.07 | 0.40 | 0.78 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
1.1.1 (new) provided a 10.25% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 10.25% | 8.88% | 13.98% | 22.58% | 15.99% | 7.31% | 5.19% | 7.61% | 6.45% | 6.55% | 2.99% | 4.33% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
BELU.ME Beluga Group PAO | 6.68% | 11.03% | 46.39% | 145.98% | 57.01% | 4.86% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSPB.ME "Bank "Saint-Petersburg" Public Joint-Stock Company | 14.83% | 15.01% | 13.71% | 18.78% | 11.47% | 5.60% | 6.24% | 6.59% | 3.76% | 1.90% | 1.57% | 4.71% |
CHMF.ME PAO Severstal | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.17% | 0.00% | 12.15% | 15.80% | 8.04% | 12.98% | 16.68% | 12.40% | 7.76% | 8.74% |
GCHE.ME Public Joint Stock Company "Cherkizovo Group" | 7.12% | 2.98% | 8.14% | 2.89% | 5.46% | 7.45% | 5.56% | 8.65% | 8.61% | 6.58% | 2.94% | 7.44% |
LKOH.ME PJSC LUKOIL | 14.29% | 9.16% | 13.99% | 13.13% | 19.49% | 8.42% | 7.66% | 5.62% | 4.54% | 9.75% | 5.42% | 6.78% |
NLMK.ME Public Joint Stock Company "Novolipetsk Steel" | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.32% | 9.93% | 15.91% | 12.36% | 8.53% | 5.73% | 6.60% |
SBER.ME Sberbank of Russia | 17.62% | 11.62% | 1.19% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 0.69% | 6.28% | 6.43% | 2.66% | 1.14% | 0.44% |
SIBN.ME Gazprom Neft | 9.16% | 9.11% | 10.86% | 11.22% | 18.67% | 9.18% | 7.82% | 6.21% | 7.86% | 8.47% | 0.26% | 5.05% |
TATN.ME PJSC Tatneft | 3.77% | 12.89% | 14.30% | 8.75% | 16.88% | 5.76% | 1.94% | 15.68% | 5.75% | 10.57% | 2.57% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 1.1.1 (new). A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the 1.1.1 (new) was 65.24%, occurring on Dec 16, 2014. Recovery took 728 trading sessions.
The current 1.1.1 (new) drawdown is 8.94%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 bear market2014 | -65.24%Dec 2014 | 3y 8mo | 2y 10mo | 6y 7moApr 2011 - Nov 2017 |
Bear market2022 | -62.04%Mar 2022 | 4mo 25d | 1y 1mo | 1y 6moOct 2021 - Apr 2023 |
COVID crash2020 | -46.61%Mar 2020 | 1mo 27d | 11mo 4d | 1y 26dJan 2020 - Feb 2021 |
2024 bear market2024 | -38.33%Nov 2024 | 5mo 2d | 2mo 29d | 8mo 1dJun 2024 - Feb 2025 |
2010 bear market2010 | -28.95%May 2010 | 1mo 10d | 5mo 17d | 6mo 27dApr 2010 - Nov 2010 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 9 assets, with an effective number of assets of 7.10, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.20 | 1.30 | 1.47 | 1.49 | 1.57 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.57, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
1.1.1 (new) correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2010 | 0.33 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. SBER.ME has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.32, while BELU.ME has the lowest at 0.18.
Asset Correlations Table
| BELU.ME | GCHE.ME | BSPB.ME | NLMK.ME | CHMF.ME | SIBN.ME | TATN.ME | LKOH.ME | SBER.ME | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELU.ME | 1.00 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.41 |
| GCHE.ME | 0.35 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.47 |
| BSPB.ME | 0.41 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.58 |
| NLMK.ME | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.61 |
| CHMF.ME | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.62 |
| SIBN.ME | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| TATN.ME | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.64 |
| LKOH.ME | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| SBER.ME | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
Find what 1.1.1 (new) is missing
See which holdings overlap, where 1.1.1 (new) is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification