Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | Momentum, Global Equities | 50% |
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | Global Equities | 50% |
Find the right asset allocation for 2
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of Jun 13, 2026, the 2 returned 12.14% Year-To-Date and 12.07% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.50% | -0.17% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 22.93% | 19.37% | 11.84% | 13.61% |
Portfolio 2 | 1.82% | 2.80% | 12.14% | 13.76% | 18.47% | 19.33% | 9.75% | 12.07% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | -0.06% | 1.84% | 1.01% | 2.27% | 2.33% | 9.40% | 5.15% | 7.44% |
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 3.33% | 3.54% | 22.33% | 24.33% | 34.54% | 28.83% | 13.78% | 16.39% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 5, 2014, 2's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.70%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 8.3 years.
Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was May 2015 with a return of +26.3%, while the worst month was Jun 2015 at -22.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 14 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.
On a daily basis, 2 closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was May 14, 2015 with a return of +29.7%, while the worst single day was Jun 4, 2015 at -21.8%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.38% | 2.85% | -7.15% | 9.19% | 4.35% | 1.66% | 12.14% | ||||||
| 2025 | 4.42% | 0.42% | -1.97% | 1.77% | 4.49% | 2.50% | -1.14% | 1.60% | 2.38% | -0.83% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 16.49% |
| 2024 | 3.99% | 4.70% | 3.72% | -3.61% | 2.96% | 3.45% | 1.24% | 2.94% | 1.28% | -0.86% | 3.66% | -3.88% | 20.87% |
| 2023 | 0.69% | -3.28% | 2.30% | 3.07% | -4.16% | 4.41% | 1.78% | -0.96% | -3.29% | -1.89% | 6.93% | 3.95% | 9.23% |
| 2022 | -7.47% | -1.18% | 5.25% | -7.29% | -2.13% | -5.77% | 3.72% | -2.36% | -6.21% | 6.48% | 5.50% | -1.70% | -13.69% |
| 2021 | -0.29% | -1.20% | 2.40% | 4.84% | 0.27% | 1.07% | 2.35% | 2.40% | -3.70% | 4.64% | -1.58% | 2.83% | 14.56% |
Benchmark Metrics
2 has an annualized alpha of 3.13%, beta of 0.47, and R2 of 0.13 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 05, 2014.
- This portfolio participated in 86.50% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 68.91% of its upside - more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
- Beta of 0.47 may look defensive, but with R2 of 0.13 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index - low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
- R2 of 0.13 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 3.13%
- Beta
- 0.47
- R²
- 0.13
- Upside Capture
- 68.91%
- Downside Capture
- 86.50%
Expense Ratio
2 has an expense ratio of 0.25%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
2 ranks 35 for risk / return — below 35% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.86 | -0.21 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 2.53 | 0.00 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.53 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 11.37 | -1.36 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 13 | 0.29 | 0.44 | 1.05 | 0.41 | 0.98 |
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 66 | 1.87 | 2.83 | 1.34 | 2.92 | 12.11 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the 2 was 35.83%, occurring on Jan 20, 2016. Recovery took 516 trading sessions.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 bear market2016 | -35.83%Jan 2016 | 1y 4mo | 2y 5d | 3y 4moSep 2014 - Jan 2018 |
COVID crash2020 | -29.89%Mar 2020 | 1mo 2d | 4mo 27d | 5mo 29dFeb 2020 - Aug 2020 |
Bear market2022 | -22.88%Sep 2022 | 8mo 29d | 1y 1mo | 1y 10moDec 2021 - Nov 2023 |
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018 | -14.00%Dec 2018 | 2mo 26d | 4mo | 6mo 26dOct 2018 - Apr 2019 |
2025 selloff2025 | -12.89%Apr 2025 | 1mo 20d | 1mo 4d | 2mo 24dFeb 2025 - May 2025 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.22 | 1.18 | 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.26 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.26, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
2 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014 | 0.57 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. XDEM.L has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.57, while XDEB.DE has the lowest at 0.47.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what 2 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where 2 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification