Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | Technology Equities | 12.50% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | Financial Services | 12.50% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | Technology | 12.50% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Technology | 12.50% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | Healthcare | 12.50% |
NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | Healthcare | 12.50% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | Technology | 12.50% |
ORCP.L Oracle Coalfields plc | Energy | 12.50% |
Find the right asset allocation for 2016
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2016, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.50% | 0.31% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 24.33% | 19.37% | 11.84% | 13.61% |
Portfolio 2016 | -0.38% | -5.82% | 1.53% | 2.62% | 32.27% | 22.61% | 13.02% | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 0.25% | -3.01% | -1.65% | -5.90% | 21.64% | 19.87% | -7.96% | 15.57% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.71% | 1.07% | -2.67% | -2.06% | 0.35% | 13.30% | 11.27% | 13.22% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.10% | -4.36% | -18.85% | -17.98% | -17.07% | 6.16% | 9.56% | 24.39% |
NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | -1.94% | -7.49% | 34.71% | 34.26% | 45.73% | -35.92% | -32.32% | -7.62% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.16% | -12.86% | 10.16% | 17.38% | 44.72% | 71.13% | 63.13% | 67.95% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -0.18% | -4.19% | -10.74% | -9.50% | -42.47% | -15.59% | 2.92% | 7.56% |
ORCP.L Oracle Coalfields plc | -0.16% | -12.83% | 26.09% | 36.02% | 184.37% | -28.41% | -37.56% | -34.80% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -2.36% | -4.29% | -27.99% | -30.28% | -6.85% | 99.99% | 39.00% | — |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 30, 2020, 2016's average daily return is +0.10%, while the average monthly return is +2.17%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.7 years.
Historically, 51% of months were positive and 49% were negative. The best month was Sep 2025 with a return of +42.0%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -19.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 6 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.
On a daily basis, 2016 closed higher 51% of trading days. The best single day was Dec 2, 2024 with a return of +14.8%, while the worst single day was May 9, 2022 at -7.7%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 12.51% | -7.05% | -7.47% | 6.68% | 8.06% | -8.98% | 1.53% | ||||||
| 2025 | -3.74% | -0.24% | -9.53% | 10.07% | 4.59% | 9.67% | 4.31% | 1.32% | 42.03% | -8.94% | -9.07% | 1.52% | 38.40% |
| 2024 | -0.90% | 16.67% | 0.90% | -2.78% | -0.06% | 5.83% | 1.87% | 1.38% | -0.37% | -2.99% | 24.05% | -7.13% | 37.96% |
| 2023 | 15.68% | -1.22% | 6.73% | -0.39% | 14.02% | 3.96% | 9.16% | -6.70% | -5.99% | -12.95% | 19.20% | -0.26% | 42.69% |
| 2022 | -15.57% | -2.32% | 4.75% | -18.96% | -4.41% | -9.19% | 16.99% | -12.06% | -8.78% | 6.32% | 4.00% | -10.20% | -43.37% |
| 2021 | 8.90% | -2.80% | 1.37% | 4.48% | 1.04% | 19.79% | -4.46% | 8.38% | -9.41% | 13.75% | -6.03% | 2.35% | 39.25% |
Benchmark Metrics
2016 has an annualized alpha of 5.95%, beta of 1.35, and R2 of 0.45 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 30, 2020.
- This portfolio captured 187.54% of S&P 500 Index gains and 148.52% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- R2 of 0.45 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior - treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 5.95%
- Beta
- 1.35
- R²
- 0.45
- Upside Capture
- 187.54%
- Downside Capture
- 148.52%
Expense Ratio
2016 has an expense ratio of 0.09%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
2016 ranks 13 for risk / return — in the bottom 13% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2016 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.86 | -1.00 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.53 | -0.99 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.34 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 2.53 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 11.37 | -8.96 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 19 | 0.61 | 1.06 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.53 |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 38 | -0.02 | 0.08 | 1.01 | -0.02 | -0.05 |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 17 | -0.70 | -0.84 | 0.89 | -0.53 | -1.08 |
NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 59 | 0.47 | 1.28 | 1.18 | 0.63 | 0.99 |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 74 | 1.20 | 1.75 | 1.21 | 2.07 | 4.94 |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 12 | -0.84 | -1.05 | 0.85 | -0.80 | -1.18 |
ORCP.L Oracle Coalfields plc | 83 | 1.05 | 2.86 | 1.35 | 3.58 | 6.04 |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 37 | -0.11 | 0.20 | 1.03 | -0.14 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
2016 provided a 0.64% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.64% | 0.50% | 0.30% | 0.31% | 0.30% | 0.33% | 0.57% | 0.50% | 0.84% | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.84% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 1.64% | 0.38% | 3.14% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.11% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
ORCP.L Oracle Coalfields plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2016. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the 2016 was 48.16%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 530 trading sessions.
The current 2016 drawdown is 17.34%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bear market2022 | -48.16%Oct 2022 | 11mo 9d | 2y 24d | 2y 12moNov 2021 - Nov 2024 |
2025 selloff2025 | -35.14%Apr 2025 | 4mo 2d | 5mo 17d | 9mo 19dDec 2024 - Sep 2025 |
2026 bear market2026 | -25.97%Mar 2026 | 5mo 21d | — | 8mo 8dOct 2025 - now |
2021 correction2021 | -17.36%Mar 2021 | 26d | 3mo 8d | 4mo 4dFeb 2021 - Jun 2021 |
2021 correction2021 | -11.56%Oct 2021 | 1mo 1d | 15d | 1mo 16dSep 2021 - Oct 2021 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 8 assets, with an effective number of assets of 8.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.72 | 1.73 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.73, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
2016 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.70 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MSFT has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.72, while ORCP.L has the lowest at 0.11.
Asset Correlations Table
| ORCP.L | NVO | BRK-B | NTLA | PLTR | NVDA | MSFT | ARKK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORCP.L | 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| NVO | 0.06 | 1.00 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.24 |
| BRK-B | 0.08 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| NTLA | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.68 |
| PLTR | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.69 |
| NVDA | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.30 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
| MSFT | 0.07 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.51 |
| ARKK | 0.08 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 1.00 |
Find what 2016 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where 2016 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification