PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2016
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


ARKK 12.50%BRK-B 12.50%MSFT 12.50%NVDA 12.50%NVO 12.50%NTLA 12.50%PLTR 12.50%ORCP.L 12.50%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for 2016

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2016, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.50%0.31%8.56%8.85%24.33%19.37%11.84%13.61%
Portfolio
2016
-0.38%-5.82%1.53%2.62%32.27%22.61%13.02%
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.25%-3.01%-1.65%-5.90%21.64%19.87%-7.96%15.57%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.71%1.07%-2.67%-2.06%0.35%13.30%11.27%13.22%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.10%-4.36%-18.85%-17.98%-17.07%6.16%9.56%24.39%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
-1.94%-7.49%34.71%34.26%45.73%-35.92%-32.32%-7.62%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.16%-12.86%10.16%17.38%44.72%71.13%63.13%67.95%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-0.18%-4.19%-10.74%-9.50%-42.47%-15.59%2.92%7.56%
ORCP.L
Oracle Coalfields plc
-0.16%-12.83%26.09%36.02%184.37%-28.41%-37.56%-34.80%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-2.36%-4.29%-27.99%-30.28%-6.85%99.99%39.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 30, 2020, 2016's average daily return is +0.10%, while the average monthly return is +2.17%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.7 years.

Historically, 51% of months were positive and 49% were negative. The best month was Sep 2025 with a return of +42.0%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -19.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 6 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, 2016 closed higher 51% of trading days. The best single day was Dec 2, 2024 with a return of +14.8%, while the worst single day was May 9, 2022 at -7.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
202612.51%-7.05%-7.47%6.68%8.06%-8.98%1.53%
2025-3.74%-0.24%-9.53%10.07%4.59%9.67%4.31%1.32%42.03%-8.94%-9.07%1.52%38.40%
2024-0.90%16.67%0.90%-2.78%-0.06%5.83%1.87%1.38%-0.37%-2.99%24.05%-7.13%37.96%
202315.68%-1.22%6.73%-0.39%14.02%3.96%9.16%-6.70%-5.99%-12.95%19.20%-0.26%42.69%
2022-15.57%-2.32%4.75%-18.96%-4.41%-9.19%16.99%-12.06%-8.78%6.32%4.00%-10.20%-43.37%
20218.90%-2.80%1.37%4.48%1.04%19.79%-4.46%8.38%-9.41%13.75%-6.03%2.35%39.25%

Benchmark Metrics

2016 has an annualized alpha of 5.95%, beta of 1.35, and R2 of 0.45 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 30, 2020.

  • This portfolio captured 187.54% of S&P 500 Index gains and 148.52% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • R2 of 0.45 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior - treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
5.95%
Beta
1.35
0.45
Upside Capture
187.54%
Downside Capture
148.52%

Expense Ratio

2016 has an expense ratio of 0.09%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

2016 ranks 13 for risk / return — in the bottom 13% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


2016 Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
2016 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2016 Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
2016 Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
2016 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
2016 Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2016 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.86

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

1.54

2.53

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.53

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

11.37

-8.96


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
19
0.611.061.120.701.53
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
38
-0.020.081.01-0.02-0.05
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
17
-0.70-0.840.89-0.53-1.08
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
59
0.471.281.180.630.99
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
74
1.201.751.212.074.94
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
12
-0.84-1.050.85-0.80-1.18
ORCP.L
Oracle Coalfields plc
83
1.052.861.353.586.04
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
37
-0.110.201.03-0.14-0.25

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current 2016 Sharpe ratio is 0.86 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.53 to 2.41, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 2016 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

2016 provided a 0.64% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.64%0.50%0.30%0.31%0.30%0.33%0.57%0.50%0.84%0.62%0.71%0.84%
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.70%0.00%0.55%1.64%0.38%3.14%1.32%0.00%2.27%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.11%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%
ORCP.L
Oracle Coalfields plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2016. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 2016 was 48.16%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 530 trading sessions.

The current 2016 drawdown is 17.34%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Bear market2022
-48.16%Oct 2022
11mo 9d2y 24d
2y 12moNov 2021 - Nov 2024
2025 selloff2025
-35.14%Apr 2025
4mo 2d5mo 17d
9mo 19dDec 2024 - Sep 2025
2026 bear market2026
-25.97%Mar 2026
5mo 21d
8mo 8dOct 2025 - now
2021 correction2021
-17.36%Mar 2021
26d3mo 8d
4mo 4dFeb 2021 - Jun 2021
2021 correction2021
-11.56%Oct 2021
1mo 1d15d
1mo 16dSep 2021 - Oct 2021

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 8 assets, with an effective number of assets of 8.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.80

1.80

1.72

1.73

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.73, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

2016 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

2016 has a 0.59 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.70


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MSFT has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.72, while ORCP.L has the lowest at 0.11.

ORCP.L
0.11
NVO
0.36
NTLA
0.46
PLTR
0.52
BRK-B
0.53
NVDA
0.67
ARKK
0.69
MSFT
0.72

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. 2016. ARKK has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.78, while BRK-B has the lowest at 0.28.

BRK-B
0.28
NVO
0.35
ORCP.L
0.41
MSFT
0.58
NVDA
0.62
NTLA
0.68
PLTR
0.69
ARKK
0.78

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 30, 2020
Diversification Analysis

Find what 2016 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where 2016 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification